Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush-bashing 'Republican' Henry Lowenstein, NYT's Favorite
NewsBusters ^ | Matthew Sheffield

Posted on 01/03/2008 10:30:58 AM PST by RatherBiased.com

The quickest way to get the liberal media to pay attention to you is to claim to be a Republican who hates Republicans. It's an almost infallible public relations strategy that of late has worked well for "Republican" Monica Green.

It's also done wonders for "lifelong Republican" Henry A. Lowenstein, who has managed to get 20 different letters published in the New York Times since 2003, a remarkable feat when you consider that the Times (by its own admission) receives around 1,000 letters a day and prints only 15 on its letters page. That means the odds of the average liberal person (the paper freely admits it favors left-wing letter writers) getting his or her letter printed are about 1.5 percent.

It's worse when you think of the numbers on a yearly scale. In the past five years, the Times has received approximately 1.8 million letters. It's printed 20 of Lowenstein's.

Remarkable really. But not really all that surprising when you consider the Times's history of quoting people like Greg Packer, a liberal New Yorker obsessed with getting press about any topic under the sun.

Back to Lowenstein though. What sorts of things does "life-long" Republican say anyway? Let's take a look.

(Excerpt) Read more at newsbusters.org ...


TOPICS: Editorial; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: New York
KEYWORDS: gregpacker; lowenstein; mediabias; newyorktimes

1 posted on 01/03/2008 10:31:00 AM PST by RatherBiased.com
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

Good catch.


2 posted on 01/03/2008 10:35:04 AM PST by SpringheelJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

There ought to be a law against things like this.


3 posted on 01/03/2008 10:37:19 AM PST by trumandogz (Hunter Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com
Henry A. Lowenstein’s political contributions. Don’t know if it is the same guy who writes the letters:

http://www.newsmeat.com/fec/bystate_detail.php?city=New+York&st=NY&last=Lowenstein&first=Henry

4 posted on 01/03/2008 10:38:28 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

I once wrote a letter to the Times many years ago asking why their maps of Israel always used the label “occupied territories” after the Six Day War, whereas their maps of Tibet always showed Tibet as simply a part of China.

Why did they apparently condone and approve of China’s conquest of Tibet, which was completely unprovoked, but refuse to recognize the Israeli conquest of neighboring territories, even though Israel was attacked by these neighbors, and only fought back to defend itself and preserve its very existence?

I got not one, but two anxious letters from Times spokespersons in reply, assuring me that there were (regretably unclear) reasons for their editorial practice with these maps. But my letter remained unpublished, naturally.


5 posted on 01/03/2008 10:43:29 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad from Tennessee

Contributions only to Democrats, supported Kerry and Obama.

Yeah, this guy is a Republican!


6 posted on 01/03/2008 10:45:01 AM PST by SolidWood (Al Gore: "I have never heard of this, but I think it is a very good idea,")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SolidWood

It fits the Times letters—one of which praises Kerry.


7 posted on 01/03/2008 10:47:50 AM PST by Brad from Tennessee ("A politician can't give you anything he hasn't first stolen from you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

Every paper seems to have one of these - probably for the letter editor”s amusement.

The Washington Post has a couple of them, and the Washington Times has a William Stosine from Iowa, a gay activist, who has (liberal) commentary on everything under the sun. He also is a regular in a lot of other papers, spamming op-eds all over the place.


8 posted on 01/03/2008 11:00:16 AM PST by oldbill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com
Anyone care to add or subtract from this list of Bush bashers who were previously Republican (some only occasionally)?

George Armitage
Michael Bloomberg
Pat Buchanan
Lincoln Caffee
Robert B. Fiske
Alan Greenspan
Jim Jeffords
Wiliam Kristol
Rich Lowry
John McCain
John McLaughlin
Robert Novak
Paul O'Neill
Kevin Phillips
Colin Powell
Olympia Snowe
Arlen Specter
George Tenet
Christie Whitman
George Will

.

9 posted on 01/03/2008 11:01:36 AM PST by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com
Philadelphia Inquirer is notorious for printing the same people over and over again.

Last time, it was only 3 days between letters for a local Democrat County official.

10 posted on 01/03/2008 11:15:18 AM PST by Doctor Raoul (Abolish the CIA, give the job to the Free Clinic who know how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com
Philadelphia Inquirer is notorious for printing the same people over and over again.

Last time, it was only 3 days between letters for a local Democrat County Party official.

11 posted on 01/03/2008 11:16:24 AM PST by Doctor Raoul (Abolish the CIA, give the job to the Free Clinic who know how to stop leaks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

I,.. I am Shocked...

Liberals lie???!!!

Sarcasm off.


12 posted on 01/03/2008 11:38:08 AM PST by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OESY

I wouldn’t call most of those “bashers.” Most of these people have praised Bush for some things and criticized him for others. That’s a good thing; we should want the Republicans to be a party of issues, not a party of personality.

As far as Republicans who have shifted to Democrats, I can only think of three examples.

1. People who grew up in Republican households and became Democrats when they were in the age 18-22 range. The most common reason is that they identify Republicanism with a parent they don’t like.

2. People who were in the Republican party for reasons of convenience and thus have no ideological loyalty anyway. I’m thinking of Lincoln Chaffee and Jim Jeffords.

3. Paul Craig Roberts. He’s in a class by himself. He was once a brilliant economist who now seems to think that 9/11 was an inside job.


13 posted on 01/03/2008 11:52:00 AM PST by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: RatherBiased.com

Leftist Dems are instructed to post letters as renegade Republicans.

And don’t think for a minute the newspapers aren’t aware they’re being scammed. I told the Chicago Tribune public editor about one such scam artist who claimed he’d “registered as a Democrat in Illinois” after being a lifelong Illinois Republican. Even the Libune shouldn’t need the civics 101 lesson I gave them—that there is NO party registration in Illinois. That the letter writer was obviously an out of stater sending a form letter.


14 posted on 01/03/2008 12:11:24 PM PST by CivilWarguy (CivilWarGuy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson