I did a yahoo search, read it, thought at the time it sounded waaaaaayyyy Leftist, but posted it anyway as some of it rang a tad of truth as does the Union arguments against the Mexican Trucking program. Many here at FR have posted their own dismay at having to agree with the Union on this topic.
Include me in the dismayed, but more reading about NAFTA causes me to wonder WHY the 1993 agreement signed by Clinton in 1994 cannot be undone. Why does GW have to persue this agreement that isn’t truly a sanctioned treaty, but another coerced by Clinton situation?
If you think about it in terms of contract law, you need to look at NAFTA's recission clause, that I imagine it has. One cannot go back to a contract after it is signed to pick and choose the provisions one wishes to uphold. One needs to tear-up the contract.