Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Buchanan: Reagan Coalition ..Dead
newsmax.com ^ | Saturday, January 5, | Newsmax Staff

Posted on 01/06/2008 8:06:01 AM PST by VU4G10

The stunning results of last week's Iowa caucuses prove that Republicans are in deep trouble and it's nobody's fault but their own, says columnist and two-time presidential candidate Pat Buchanan.

In his latest syndicated column, "Last Hurrah For Reagan Coalition?" Buchanan, a top White House aide in both the Nixon and Reagan White Houses, warned that the huge Democratic turnout in Iowa Caucuses, more than double that of the Republicans, coupled with what he called "the stampede by independents to vote in the Democratic precincts,” could mean that that Iowa, "a swing state carried by President Bush in 2004, may be lost irretrievably to the GOP in 2008."

Asking why Iowa is walking away from the GOP and why Barack Obama won almost as many votes as all the Republicans put together, Buchanan explained that the GOP lost Iowa "because of its persistent failure to recognize, and its refusal to address, the anxiety and insecurity of the middle class."

Wrote historian Buchanan "The Party of Reagan is losing the country because it is no longer the party of the principles, policies and persona of Reagan, as applied to the problems of our time. "

Turning to conservative yearnings for another Reagan, Buchanan wrote that the GOP "is mired in the past, looking back to the time of Reagan." Reagan, he wrote, “was a good man and a great president, but our time is no more his time than the Eisenhower 1950s were like the 1920s.”

Buchanan, one of the keenest political observers of our times, blamed the decline of Republican party on a series of departures from the GOP's basic principals which formed the foundation of the Reagan revolution and the long held convictions of his party.

Among the factors he writes which have led to the GOP's impending downfall:

Iraq. "Parties that march nations into what the people come to see as unnecessary or unwinnable wars face the inevitable consequences."

Truman suffered those consequences as a result of the Korean conflict as did Lyndon Johnson because of Viet Nam.

Globalism. “With the sole exception of Mike Huckabee” he wrote, “the GOP seems unable to comprehend how throwing U.S. Workers into Darwinian competition with foreigners earning one-fifth or one-tenth their wages impacts the Reagan Democrats now deserting the GOP. A party that used to admonish one and all, ‘There is no free lunch,’ cannot see that free trade is no free lunch.”

None of this means that the GOP is in grave trouble, or that defeat in 2008 is not foreordained, Buchanan admonishes, observing that the Democrats are winning “not because of the superiority of their candidates or ideas but because the Republicans are perceived as failing.”

Neither Hillary Clinton nor Barack Obama, he writes “has the answer to what ails America. Both, and Barack especially, have moved far outside the mainstream of the nation.

"‘I am the change agent,’ each of the Democrats proclaims. He asks if it is not madness to promise 50 million people, half of them immigrants, legal and illegal, national health insurance when America is facing an entitlements crisis with Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid -- unfunded liabilities adding up to scores of trillions of dollars?

Who, he asks, “is going to pay for this when the states are heading back toward bankruptcy, the economy is slowly sinking, U.S. Companies are being taxed up to 40 percent and the most successful Americans are already paying half their income to local, state and federal governments?”

Do Democrats “have an answer to the immigration crisis that now grips every great American city?”, he asks, adding that “the amnesty, the ‘path to citizenship’ they favor, will mean the next invasion will be the last and decisive invasion that makes America unrecognizable.”

Could the Democrats, which he calls “the Party of Government that depends on government workers and unions at election time make government more efficient? Does anyone think that a party that depends on teachers unions and the NEA can reform the social Katrina that is inner-city education in America? Was it not Democrats who ran the city of New Orleans and the state of Louisiana in the time of Katrina? But the American people want change, and Democrats represent change.”

If, the Republican Party, “on issue after issue … stood true to its beliefs and purged the twin heresies of neoconservatism in foreign policy and Wall Street Journal ideology in trade and immigration policy, it would still stand well with Middle America.”

Most Americans, he explains remain “traditionalist on right to life, homosexual marriage, a polluted culture and Hollywood values. Most Americans believe in a defense second to none, while staying out of wars that are not our quarrels.”

Buchanan insists that Republicans “believe in conservative judges and strict-constructionists justices like Antonin Scalia, who he says do not write the laws, but interpret the laws we have written through our elected representatives.”

He writes that Democrats know this and are thus not promising us any new [leftist Supreme Court judge] Ruth Bader Ginsburgs.

“What has alienated America is the Bush bellicosity, the my-way-or-the-highway free-trade ideology, the refusal to defend the border with the implication that anyone who wants to preserve the country he grew up in is some kind of bigot”, Buchanan concludes.

“The Party of Reagan is losing the country because it is no longer the party of the principles, policies and persona of Reagan, as applied to the problems of our time.”


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; buchanan; gop; nh2008; patbuchanan
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

1 posted on 01/06/2008 8:06:02 AM PST by VU4G10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

Go Pat go......away!


2 posted on 01/06/2008 8:09:25 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
We’ve won without Iowa before. We can do it again.
3 posted on 01/06/2008 8:12:20 AM PST by pnh102
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

It may not be dead but it is being held hostage.


4 posted on 01/06/2008 8:12:32 AM PST by cripplecreek (Only one consistent conservative in this race and his name is Hunter.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: VU4G10

Does he accept any responsibility for it? (rolling eyes)


6 posted on 01/06/2008 8:14:17 AM PST by penelopesire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

How long does the condition of “sour grapes” last?


7 posted on 01/06/2008 8:15:24 AM PST by rod1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
Yeah, a guy who hasn’t been right on a single thing in 20 years should be lecturing us on anything.

Pat, past time you simply ride off into retirement. You have gone from embarrassingly wrong to senile.

8 posted on 01/06/2008 8:15:27 AM PST by MNJohnnie (If Republicans want to lose to the Dems in 2008, they should run John "Bob Dole Jr" McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182
Turning to conservative yearnings for another Reagan, Buchanan wrote that the GOP "is mired in the past, looking back to the time of Reagan." Reagan, he wrote, “was a good man and a great president, but our time is no more his time than the Eisenhower 1950s were like the 1920s.” _________________________________________________________- I thought conservative principles were timeless. They were as valid in 1980 as in 1920, 1930, and......even today. I must confess, I find Buchanan to be one of the most inconsistent Conservatives writers. If Reagan was a conservative (and he applied timeless, conservative principles), then why can't we yearn for someone like Reagan?
9 posted on 01/06/2008 8:16:02 AM PST by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: bert

Pat is a murderer in the Jesuit tradition

_____________________________________________________

Huh?


10 posted on 01/06/2008 8:17:32 AM PST by Bishop_Malachi (Liberal Socialism - A philosophy which advocates spreading a low standard of living equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Anti-Bubba182

Just another loud noise from GASBAG PAT!


11 posted on 01/06/2008 8:18:27 AM PST by A. Morgan (Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Bingo!... ZZZZZZZZZZING!


12 posted on 01/06/2008 8:19:46 AM PST by A. Morgan (Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

There is just a lack of representation for our view today. 24 months ago, the Democrat party was ‘dead’. Things are never as good or bad as it is portrayed to be.

I have watch about 45 minute of last night’s debate, and I am really excited about the depth of the debate and that there are about five people there clearly communicating the realities of jihadists and our correct decisions on foreign policy.


13 posted on 01/06/2008 8:19:53 AM PST by ilgipper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bishop_Malachi

Pat is a crank appealing to other cranks. Notice you see him
on MSNBC and not on Fox and that is because he is so negative
he does not fit, but has to appear on a network stacked against the GOP.


14 posted on 01/06/2008 8:20:22 AM PST by Anti-Bubba182
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
Gee Pat,

You mean the Reagan that signed 6 tax HIKES? A Real Illegal Amnesty? Doubled Federal Spending? Spent Record Deficits? negotiated with the commies? Played footsie with Iran's mullah? Ran away from an Islamo fascist threat? The Reagan people like you, Pat, during the late 1980s routinely accused of betraying the Conservative movement?

Simply sad how the Establishment Conservative media simply can do nothing these day but whine hysterically about everything

15 posted on 01/06/2008 8:20:28 AM PST by MNJohnnie (If Republicans want to lose to the Dems in 2008, they should run John "Bob Dole Jr" McCain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

Pat should shut up and let his good looking sister speak for the family.


16 posted on 01/06/2008 8:20:39 AM PST by csmusaret (Mnimum wage today; maximum wage tomorrow. It's the Socialist way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
Buchanan, one of the keenest political observers of our times, (very debatable premise here) blamed the decline of Republican party on a series of departures from the GOP's basic principals which formed the foundation of the Reagan revolution and the long held convictions of his party (true statement).

the economy is slowly sinking,

Right, sure, it's 1929 all over again. My wife went to the mall yesterday couldn't find a parking space!! Drove around for 20 minutes looking for parking. I'm not talking about finding a convenient parking space that's no more than 10 spaces from an entrance, I'm talking about finding ANY space.

Yep, the economy's gone to hell alright.

17 posted on 01/06/2008 8:20:46 AM PST by Hardastarboard (DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

The Reagan tent has been hijacked by the two selfish warring factions. The elitist global snob liberals and the well meaning, but totally misguided, Religious right liberals.

They are both merely fighting over who gets respected. This is why neither one of them will get their way in 2008.

All of us fans of the Reagan tent are the ones who will get screwed because we really want conservative principles. Sticking to that could have won it for us.

The MSM know it and so do the Democrats. This religious battle between Huck and Romney is getting old and tiring. Frankly I am about done with it. I know I am not alone in thinking this.

If we ever get back to policy and record, most of them should be booted.


18 posted on 01/06/2008 8:22:41 AM PST by dforest (Duncan Hunter is the best hope we have on both fronts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10
Not quite as dead as Pat.

Just look at what he has been reduced to. Embarrassing

19 posted on 01/06/2008 8:22:53 AM PST by G.Mason (And what is intelligence if not the craft of out-thinking our adversaries?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VU4G10

Can’t say I completely disagree with him.

He got one big thing right: the GOP is no longer the party of Reagan (and hasn’t been for some time).


20 posted on 01/06/2008 8:25:12 AM PST by abercrombie_guy_38
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson