Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sourcery; Politicalmom; 2ndDivisionVet; fieldmarshaldj

“We must unite behind a candidate that is at least acceptable to all the major factions, and who also has a reasonable chance to run an effective, winning campaign in the general election.”

Sounds like Fred Thompson to me.


56 posted on 01/06/2008 1:04:50 PM PST by Clintonfatigued (You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Clintonfatigued

Fred gets my check next to his name. When a person starts assigning to government the directives of their religion, then the line of separation has been crossed. Social justice is a religious burden, not one for the government.


58 posted on 01/06/2008 1:18:42 PM PST by pacpam (action=consequence and applies in all cases - friend of victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

To: Clintonfatigued

Me too. The horrible spectre of any of the Democrats choosing the replacements for Ginsburg and Stevens is my overriding concern. I don’t want the chooser to be in fealty to NARAL, NOW, or MoveOn.org. I will not enable such a catastrophe by voting my heart, instead of my head, when a decades-long, disastrous SCOTUS is in the balance.


61 posted on 01/06/2008 1:28:22 PM PST by GAgal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson