Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Joe Boucher
That is not what I said...

Yes it is. You implied this was a good shoot. Over vegetable matter.

If this mother of several was aware of drugs in the home then she is to blame...

Not spinning it or adding anything to it. If you feel that possession of drugs is grounds for a "no-trial" execution... don't run from it. You imply she got what you feel she deserved.

She wasn't mother of the year by any stretch. But they killed her on mere suspicion of ownership of a non-authorized plant. Do you think this is a valid government police power?

64 posted on 01/06/2008 3:05:52 PM PST by Dead Corpse (What would a free man do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: Dead Corpse

Well, there is that little “due process of law” thingy.
Details, details.

Hell, the cops saved the county the cost of a trial and incarcerations so that’s a good deal, right?


75 posted on 01/06/2008 3:13:05 PM PST by djf (...and dying in your bed, many years from now, did you donate to FR?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

To: Dead Corpse

No, and i didn’t say it was there pal so jump to conclusions if you may.
This woman should not have allowed crack in to her home with the babies there. Did she deserve to die?
Probably not. We don’t know the facts other than crack was there with so many kids.
Did the cops need to go in with a swat team? Probably not. Do I have empathy or sympathy for her? NOt in the least.


87 posted on 01/06/2008 3:20:10 PM PST by Joe Boucher (An enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson