ping.
Need to get this man some money.
I hope with all sincerity that this strategy works.
(I’m not saying some OTHER candidates don’t also get a negative bias from the MSM, but) Why is it that Fred HAS TO defend his strategy? Why don’t the headlines read “Rudy Defends FLorida Firewall Strategy” or “Mitt Defends Heavy Spending on Primary Ads”?
I'm waiting for the Fred Thompson people to come in and say that Fred Thompson is lying about his campaign being out of money, like they have the past week whenever any news organization said he was cash-poor.
They expect him to charge into the Northeast where regional polling shows him pulling 4%? His decision to show himself viable in Iowa can only offset the media push against him. He needs a strong showing there to make a statement.
Outrageous. "Forced" to deny? It was a false report. A lie. To characterize setting the record straight as being "forced to deny" is journalist activism of the worst sort.
Thompson was real tonight.
Romney was too slick. He did not win in my opinion. I just don’t trust him. Can’t really tell you why.
Just don’t trust Romney!
He’d have more money to use where he needs it if he hadn’t wasted so much in Iowa.
Last night was the first time my wife had time to pay attention to the Republican contenders. I had told her a while ago that Fred was the man.
After watching the debate, she had two comments.
“He’s the only one up there that’s right.”
“He doesn’t stand a chance, does he...”
She’s right on the first comment. Hopefully wrong on the second.