Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Eroteme
To characterize setting the record straight as being "forced to deny" is journalist activism of the worst sort.

And what would be the results of not denying it? Political suicide? Why would he not feel like he was forces to deny it? If the reporter asked you if you had stopped beating your wife, what would be your response? Would it feel forced?

17 posted on 01/06/2008 5:58:15 PM PST by BipolarBob (I've been stung by honey bees and bumblebees. I don't want no huckle bee.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: BipolarBob

Of course Thompson should have responded to it, and he did. I did not suggest otherwise. I was pointing out the article writer’s furtherance of the damage and inaccuracy by her choice of words. If the writer wished to convey the facts without inserting a personal dig, she could have done so. The English language is rich with options, and presumably a CNN reporter has command of them. Even the word “reports” was charged with innuendo. A more accurate reporter without an agenda would have referred specified “an unsourced rumor on a blog.”


24 posted on 01/06/2008 7:19:46 PM PST by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson