Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MHT
Name the category—she lost in all of them, not just the out-of-state college kids.

The only category she won was the 60-something women, according to the election night pundits.

That being said, I got a HUGE kick out of the news I was hearing here in Illinois the next day to the effect that one of the news stations had a quote by Daniel Hynes, who had run in the 2004 primary against Obama for the US Senate.

Hynes went to IA to campaign for Obama in this recent caucus and was quoted as saying that he visited a caucus site shortly before it opened and was surprised to find himself in line with a bunch of Republicans and Independents all enthused about voting for Obama.

That comment about made me fall out of my chair.

Were those voters voting FOR Obama or eagerly crossing over and voting AGAINST Hillary? My guess would be the latter.

36 posted on 01/07/2008 4:39:44 AM PST by NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: NotJustAnotherPrettyFace
No doubt that a part, size unknown, of the Obama vote was anti-Hillary. People have been saving up their feelings about Hillary for years and this was anybody except a New Yorker's first opportunity to tell the witch how we really feel about her.

This begs the question of whether the Edwards (union) vote would go to Obama or Hillary once he leaves.

38 posted on 01/07/2008 6:11:27 AM PST by MHT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson