Jacqui Smith: The Home Secretary had promised to toughen the migrant system
Posted on 01/07/2008 2:14:51 AM PST by Stoat
Jacqui Smith: The Home Secretary had promised to toughen the migrant system
A leaked memo obtained by the Daily Mail suggests they are not regarded as a high enough priority.
The secret edict makes a mockery of Government claims to be running a "robust" immigration system.
Last night insiders in the service said hundreds of thousands of students - including many who never had any intention of studying - could be staying on illegally and were effectively being granted an amnesty.
Union chiefs said immigration bosses were setting their deportation priorities on the basis of "what the media is paying attention to" - meaning that only foreign prisoners and failed asylum seekers were currently targets while thousands of other illegal immigrants were ignored.
They blamed the fiasco on a crippling cash crisis, claiming there were simply too few officers to enforce the law.
Students are by far the biggest category for long-term visitors to Britain, with 1.6million visas handed out in the last five years.
No figures are available on overstayers because no checks are made on who leaves Britain.
The memo was written on December 17 by Jonathan Lindley, director of enforcement at the Border and Immigration Agency, which is struggling against a massive budget overspend.
Sent to the agency's six regional directors, it reveals how the organisation's chief executive Lin Homer personally intervened to halt one deportation.
The note describes a recent rule change which was meant to crack down on student overstayers, making them automatically liable for refusal if they sought a visa extension.
David Davis: The Shadow Home Secretary labelled the government's priorites 'warped'
"A proportion of these refusals have led to removal some of which have been enforced.
"One such case came to Lin Homer's attention last week, resulting in the removal being cancelled and some critical comments from Lin.
"I am surprised that any of these cases have come sufficiently high within enforcement teams' priorities to merit such quick removal action.
"Please instruct your enforcement teams not to proceed with enforcing any student refusal cases unless they are deemed, at at least inspector level, to be a priority due to Harm (a reference to the Home Office system of gauging how harmful it is for an illegal immigrant to remain in the country).
"Student case working teams have been instructed not to pass any further student refusal cases linked to this issue to enforcement teams."
Huge numbers of students flock to Britain with 309,000 arriving in 2006, up nine per cent in a year, and more than double the number of foreigners granted work permits.
The personal intervention of Miss Homer, the £200,000-a-year head of the immigration system, to stop an illegal over-stayer from being deported raises grave questions over political interference in the work of frontline staff.
Just days before the secret memo was written Home Secretary Jacqui Smith gave a speech in London boasting of plans to toughen up the system, promising "robust management" to ensure that all migrants "play by the rules".
John Tincey, of the Immigration Service Union, said yesterday: "This is an astonishing order. But this is the way the BIA is going in an era of "risk-assessment" and "intelligence-led operations".
"The main priorities are removing foreign national prisoners, followed by failed asylum seekers. Student visa overstayers aren't on the list at all.
"Home Office priorities depend on what the media are paying attention to at any particular time, and officers find themselves trying to second guess what their targets will be next month.
"It all comes down to the service running out of money."
Shadow Home Secretary David Davis said "warped Government priorities" were forcing immigration officers to "turn a blind eye to those with no right to stay in the UK".
Sir Andrew Green, chairman of the MigrationWatch think tank, said: "This document exposes the failure of the Government to develop a removals capacity which is remotely sufficient for the massive scale of immigration."
No, it comes down to Socialists not taking immigration and national sovereignty seriously enough....if at all.
I seem to recall some people who entered the United States on student visas and overstayed their welcome. They then went on to cause 'just a bit' of trouble back in 2001.
This will be a perfect mechanism by which to populate the UK with terrorist sleeper cells, as well as a variety of undesirables.
Please say a prayer for our dear British Friends..
The Brits are a shadow of things to come in America....we have this issue with creaping socialism that no one wants to admit....
"Please instruct your enforcement teams not to proceed with enforcing any student refusal cases unless they are deemed, at at least inspector level, to be a priority due to Harm (a reference to the Home Office system of gauging how harmful it is for an illegal immigrant to remain in the country).
One naturally wonders how many other enforcement areas have been cut where the memo for it has not been leaked.
Maybe these illegals are needed - they just want to do the work the Brits won’t do - picking fruit, blowing up trains and buses ...
Keep your powder dry, if that Huckleberry gets in how far behind are the suicide bombers going to be?
stop deporting foreign students who overstay their visas
America leads already, our Homeland Security hasn’t been thoroughly purged of Democrat permissiveness since it started.
Just quietly complying with the Treaty of Lisbon( european constitution )....you know that document Gordon Brown signed in the dead of night.One day you will wake up and notice it
. When you complain, they will tell you " Its been our practice and quiet policy for years, its now the law, it would be unfair to change it".
Insidious, isn't it.
I think the Immigration bureaucracy goes specifically after high-quality immigrants. They'll leave MS-13 creeps alone, but go after MBA's.
I want to see the laws enforced, but the crowd enforcing them have to be watched.
I'd estimate at least since FDR, with a few interludes of sanity such as JFK's tax cuts and Scoop Jackson's defense spending.
That sounds quite plausible, thank you.
BTW I’m guessing that if JFK were alive today he would be a hardcore Dittohead and wouldn’t recognize the Dem party at all. It’s amusing that the Left views him as such a saint, as his economic policies were quite far from Clintonian.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.