1 posted on
01/07/2008 9:12:15 AM PST by
Tlaloc
To: Tlaloc
To: Tlaloc
Huck would be a great prez. Is it a risk to nominate him? Seems like McCain or Rudy will still end up getting the nom. But who knows as of this point?
3 posted on
01/07/2008 9:20:50 AM PST by
guitarist
To: Tlaloc
I distinctly remember being disappointed with Huck last year over his lack of support for the surge.
Huck can spin this however he wants, he did not fully back the Pres.
4 posted on
01/07/2008 9:31:12 AM PST by
mission9
(It ain't bragging if you can do it.)
To: BillyBoy; unspun; nckerr; wastedpotential; Sola Veritas; AFA-Michigan; JohnnyZ; Yomin Postelnik; ...
6 posted on
01/07/2008 9:33:06 AM PST by
Tlaloc
To: Tlaloc
He’s such a quick wit! What a great President he’s be, what with his one-liners and Bible quoting and his adorable Ozarky family!
To: Tlaloc
OK, when a candidate is putting out his OWN releases, and the best he can do to prove he supported something is THIS:
asserted his support for the surge saying: "I think we've got to give him a chance to let it work. Whether it's the right decision, I honestly don't know because I don't have the access to the kind of military and intelligence information that he does. But he's the commander-in-chief, and we've got to give him an opportunity."
That's pretty sad.
To: Tlaloc
What’s this? Al Rueters supporting the Huck.
To: Tlaloc
Huckabee, McCain, and Romney, could keep each other occupied for years just sniping back and forth over the recent significant “revamping” they have done to their own records.
17 posted on
01/07/2008 12:52:11 PM PST by
Route66
(America's Main Street - - - Fred D. Thompson / Consistent Conservative...The One with Gravitas)
To: Tlaloc
In my opinion those are good points at a bad time. For the sake of our common cause as conservatives, it would probably be best if Governor Romney disabled Senator McCain’s campaign in New Hampshire.
18 posted on
01/07/2008 8:32:52 PM PST by
Kurt Evans
(This message not approved by any candidate or candidate's committee.)
To: LordBridey; unspun; PhilCollins; Arcy; livius; brwnsuga; HisKingdomWillAbolishSinDeath; ...
HUCK-A-PING! "Unelectable" Huckabee is winning elections!
***SKY IS FALLING, SOUND THE ALARMS***
In the interest of equal time, we now present the following rebuttal from FR's own FredHeads (many of whom are in need of Metamucil):
"This article is LIES!!! ALL LIES!!!! Everyone knows ONLY FRED is conservative!!!!! Huckabee is a MARXIST SOCIALIST COMMUNIST DIRTBAG LIBERAL SCUMBAG who LOVES ILLEGAL-ALIENS & CRIMINALS & TERRORISTS & NANNY-STATE TAX-HIKING LEFTIST DEMOCRATS!!! He is the MSN created candidate ,a reincarnation of CARTER, CLINTON, ELMER-GANTRY, MAO, HILTER, O.J. SIMPSON & POL POT!!! Huck DESTROYED ARKANSAS and will DESTROY the GOP & AMERICA TOOOOOOOOOO!!! RUDY is better than Huck!! Hell, I'll take HILLARY over HUCK!! A vote for HUCKLEBURRY is a vote to CHOP-UP LITTLE PUPPIES IN A BLENDER!!!!!!!!!! YEEEEEEEEEEEEEAGGGH!!!"
"And oh yea, vote Fred 2008 or you're a douchebag & liberal sellout"
TRUTH SQUAD: Click HERE to find out how freepers felt about Mike Huckabees record when he was actually IN office.
23 posted on
01/12/2008 4:23:05 PM PST by
BillyBoy
(Fred Thompson isn't the second coming of Ronald Reagan, he's the second coming of Stephen Douglas!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson