Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranians threaten to blow up US Navy ships _ Hormuz Strait
Telegraph UK ^ | 4:12pm GMT 07/01/2008 | Damien McElroy, Foreign Affairs Correspondent

Posted on 01/07/2008 10:27:59 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Enough talk from the US blabbermouth bureaucrats and start firing. These “warnings” are getting a bit embarrassing.
21 posted on 01/07/2008 10:45:49 AM PST by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

It won’t happen again I bet. We actually had our finger on the button to make some Iranian fish food. Historically its been a form of counting “coup” the American Indians did it to harass soldiers. We could play the game but up the stakes, I mean put some heads on stakes.
I ernestly hope somebody has a plan to step ahead of the game, get a Predator to hang around and stop them as they leave shore.


22 posted on 01/07/2008 10:45:51 AM PST by Eye of Unk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Amen..Thank you, Ernest.May God Keep Safe All In Harm’s Way.


23 posted on 01/07/2008 10:46:13 AM PST by MEG33 (GOD BLESS OUR ARMED FORCES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited

Not at 200 yds - too far away for anything but a combo meal of lead poisoning and water ingestion.


24 posted on 01/07/2008 10:46:14 AM PST by azhenfud (The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: All
Forgive my ignorance on this but could a swarm of ships of this size, armed with one or two torpedoes each, do damage to a small group of ships such as this one?
25 posted on 01/07/2008 10:46:31 AM PST by newnhdad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

Could be. The Strait has been probably the major flashpoint should one of the ME producers decide to commit economic suicide.


26 posted on 01/07/2008 10:46:51 AM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; cva66snipe
This cannot be allowed to happen again. The next time patrol boats approach American vessels and threaten attack, one of them has to head to the bottom of the gulf. If the Iranians want a test, we can provide them with one for emergency evac.

Precisely right. Ed is correct, that we need to "send a message" that we will not be reduced to "playing chicken" on the high seas because we are afraid of war.

This kind of stunt is intended to show that we WON'T fight. That we will always back down.

This dangerous and reckless provocation has to be met with appropriate responses. An open radio threat such as was received....should have been the END for the entire flotilla.

That it wasn't implies that the rules of engagement are simply hand-cuffing our captains.

27 posted on 01/07/2008 10:47:17 AM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
It should get the risk premium for oil back up there...helps the OPECers///

From ABCNES:

Iranians threatened U.S. ships in Hormuz: Pentagon

********************EXCERPT************************

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Five Iranian boats made aggressive maneuvers and showed hostile intent towards three U.S. Navy ships at the weekend in the Strait of Hormuz, a major oil shipping route in the Gulf, the Pentagon said on Monday.

The Pentagon said the incident was serious. It described the Iranian actions as "careless, reckless and potentially hostile" and said Tehran should provide an explanation.

*****************************************

In Tehran, the Iranian foreign ministry described the incident as ordinary.

"The example that happened on Saturday was similar to previous cases and is an ordinary and natural issue," Foreign Ministry spokesman Mohammad Ali Hosseini told Iran's official IRNA news agency.

"This is an ordinary issue that happens for the two sides every once in a while and, after the identification of the two sides, the issue is resolved."

28 posted on 01/07/2008 10:48:19 AM PST by Ernest_at_the_Beach (No Burkas for my Grandaughters!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Brilliant

Vince Flynn’s fiction is turned into the truth.


29 posted on 01/07/2008 10:48:41 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

If there was “an order to fire,” then why didn’t we fire? Was it discretionary? Also, what would we be firing? Phalanx?


30 posted on 01/07/2008 10:49:20 AM PST by ProtectOurFreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: newnhdad

Yes, indeed. It would be suicide but severe damage to Navy equipment and personnel is possible.


31 posted on 01/07/2008 10:49:20 AM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Ancient Drive

Where are the fishing poles?


32 posted on 01/07/2008 10:50:11 AM PST by ImJustAnotherOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
“Officials call it ‘provocative;’ Iran says ships didn’t recognize each other”

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/22537199/

33 posted on 01/07/2008 10:50:52 AM PST by tobyhill (The media lies so much the truth is the exception)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

You would think oil would blip upward at this, but it seems to be a non event for the commodity exchange.


34 posted on 01/07/2008 10:51:22 AM PST by RightWhale (Dean Koonz is good, but my favorite authors are Dun and Bradstreet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
All they need to do, is for us to fire first, then they have achieved a propaganda victory similar to the Brit incident.

Nah. There, the Iranians assaulted that small British patrol with overwhelming firepower, here it is the opposite, a small Iranian patrol attempting to take on vessels far more powerful than they are.

It is a propaganda victory for them if they come away from that encounter without being obliterated.

They weren't, hence it becomes another in a string of such propaganda victories that we are handing them by fence-sitting and ham-handed rules of engagement.

35 posted on 01/07/2008 10:51:27 AM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
The Iranian craft came within 200 yards of the US vessels, which were sailing in international waters.

They'd have been shark sh** at 10x that distance had I been at the trigger.

36 posted on 01/07/2008 10:51:41 AM PST by MarineBrat (My wife and I took an AIDS vaccination that the Church offers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw; Cachelot; Nix 2; veronica; Catspaw; knighthawk; Alouette; Optimist; weikel; Lent; GregB; ..
If you'd like to be on this middle east/political ping list, please FR mail me.

High volume. Articles on Israel can also be found by clicking on the Topic or Keyword Israel, WOT

..................

37 posted on 01/07/2008 10:53:16 AM PST by SJackson (If 45 million children had lived, they'd be defending America, filling jobs, paying SS-Z. Miller)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach
Ten months ago, the Iranians tested British resolve in the Gulf, and came away with an important propaganda victory after capturing 15 Royal Navy sailors and marines. The UK did not engage in a military response, and Mahmoud Ahmadinejad gave the Brits a "gift" by returning the captives.


38 posted on 01/07/2008 10:53:17 AM PST by B-Cause (“If you think health care is expensive now, wait until it is free!”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ProtectOurFreedom
Also, what would we be firing? Phalanx?

No. Those are for close-in-antimissle defense. Most likely the Five-inch guns.

39 posted on 01/07/2008 10:54:33 AM PST by Paul Ross (Ronald Reagan-1987:"We are always willing to be trade partners but never trade patsies.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach

They were expecting our soldiers to play nice like the Brits. That Fire Away command was not foreseen...


40 posted on 01/07/2008 10:54:47 AM PST by Ancient Drive
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson