I’m not that good with that modern euphemistical language.
“A transgender woman” the text spoke of:
• Is that someone born with balls but now does not?
• Or is that someone born without balls that walks like a man and shaves?
• Or is it someone born with balls, still has balls, but pretends to be a woman? Should we further break it down into those who pretend full-time and part-time?
• Or is it somebody born without balls that just kind of acts like a guy but doesn’t need to shave?
Or......? The options we have in modern society! We have come a long way girls/boys/transgender/transsexual/gay people! That’s called progress! We’re so progressive that I don’t have a frigging clue what “it” is.
How is it that homosexuals can reject being with “women” and then pair up with women who were “born in mens’ bodies” requiring surgery to release their inner woman?
Aren’t those homosexuals then dating “women” in their eyes? OR are they just using some terms to cloak their own confusion (rhetorical question).
How is it that homosexuals can reject being with “women” and then pair up with women who were “born in mens’ bodies” requiring surgery to release their inner woman?
Aren’t those homosexuals then dating “women” in their eyes? OR are they just using some terms to cloak their own confusion (rhetorical question).