Posted on 01/07/2008 12:12:29 PM PST by SmithL
Fred is not dead. But his campaign is hanging by a thread.
That pretty much sums up where Fred Thompson's bid for the White House stands.
Heading into last week's Iowa caucuses, many political observers were saying the former U.S. senator from Tennessee needed to at least finish third to remain in the hunt for the Republican nomination.
Thompson got that, narrowly beating out Sen. John McCain for the third-place spot by less than one percentage point.
That's the good news, such as it was. But the bad news is that attention has now shifted to Tuesday's New Hampshire primary, where Thompson isn't expected to do particularly well.
According to data released Friday by the Zogby International polling firm, Thompson was running in sixth place there, behind the other four major Republican contenders and long-shot hopeful Ron Paul.
Thompson's not polling well in Michigan, either, which will be the next event on the primary calendar. That leaves him in a situation where he'll almost have to win the Jan. 19 South Carolina primary in order to last until Feb. 5, when more than 20 states, including Tennessee, will hold their primaries.
Winning South Carolina may be an even tougher task for Thompson than it seemed a week ago.
(Excerpt) Read more at commercialappeal.com ...
Since midnight last night, Fred has gain 218 friends on MySpace. That’s kinda a big deal.
Could it be that he's as fake as it is asserted that Romney is? Granted, Romney comes off as easy as a three-sizes-too-big pair of plastic flip-flops, but Huckabee makes Eddie Haskell come off as an amature snow-job artist.
LLS
‘Bout peed myself on that one!
LLS
~snip~
Former Arkansas governor Mike Huckabee, who finished first in Iowa’s Republican caucuses, is a fellow Southerner who espouses many of the same conservative principles that Thompson does.
~snip~
The only things Thompson and Huckabee share in common is they’re both running for the Republican nomination for president.
NH liberal beyond liberlism... NH means nothing in the Conservative world... beyond it’s paltry delegate count.
LLS
Wyoming is fly over country to the msm. They don’t count in their minds.
I never thought I would find a smoother flim-flam artist running in the Republican primary as Romney. Huckabee has proven that incorrect. Their styles may differ, but they are both “disguising” their past.
I don’t know. Might be it. Over my life I’ve come to listen to that “inner voice” that says “DON’T DO THAT!”
When I meet someone or watch them for the first time speaking (either TV or in person) I can and do generally get a ‘feeling’ about them. I remember Bill Clinton giving me that ‘feeling’ when he was being interviewed on TV during the campaigns before he went on to beat Bush. There was a particular thing that caught my ear, about “Drug addicts”. I don’t remember the precise exchange but something he said sounded good at the time, like “he wasn’t for giving drug addicts help” - and I knew he was lying. Later I found out he was helping a brother who was a drug addict or something along those lines. Anyway, it’s been to many years to remember the exact details, but the VOICE said “He’s lying”.
I get the same thing about Huckabee and I know very little about his background or positions (I know MUCH more about Ron Paul for instance, and I’d not vote for him on a BET).
I like Hunter and Thompson and I’ve met Thompson once, long ago when he was much younger and I remember him as coming across as a real person, no fake, and very genuine. I can’t say that about the rest of them at all.
I have HEARD stories about Hillary from people inside the WH whom I know well, and she’s someone to avoid like a terrible disease. She’s bad for America. Period.
But, Huckabee comes across to me as not-so-genuine, and he may indeed be a liar, I don’t know that for sure, but he comes across as someone to NOT TRUST. Thus, I listen to the voice.
Interesting. I would regard Huckabee and Thompson as about as far apart as two candidates can be in the race (Hunter excluded). They agree on some social issues (although Huckabee appears to be a weak sister on school choice) but Thompson is a constitutional federalist. Huckabee shows no understanding of that idea. I lean to Thompson; but I lean strongly against Huckabee.
“FT need not dig deep for a dossier on Huck.
Huck is RUNNING straight out as an economic populist using liberal parlance.
He is RUNNING a campaign on CHANGING the Republican Party.
FT must REPEAT Huff’s platform where ever he goes, not get in the weeds about numbers.”
Like you said Huckabee is not hiding his message. He’s running as a change candidate within the GOP, and like it or not, he’s getting traction. So someone somewhere is impressed.
I think most of Huck’s voters are suckered. Once he’s outed I think they’d head for Thompson v. Romney.
Fred Smith endorsed McCain very early, if that means anything.
What have I been saying,,,,,,,,,,,
This board complains about big spending Republicans when they need to look at their fellow Americans who do not even behave as Americans anymore, and elect these men.
They are completely dependent on government, becoming wards of the State, literally and emotionally.
To change it, will take much grass-root work in the States, not calling DC and complaining.
Fred doesn’t want it as bad as Huckabee.
I think the more someone “wants to be President” the LESS we should want to vote for them. Washington was PRESSED to the position.
Thompson had to be begged by literally thousands of us to “join up”.
He’s the man.
Fred’s wife wants him to be President, I’m not so sure Fred does.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.