To: Laissez-faire capitalist
It ain’t over after one lousy primary. The Republicans in Iowa don’t get to select the nominee all by themselves. I believe it has something to do with a delegate count? ;-)
7 posted on
01/07/2008 12:20:32 PM PST by
rhombus
To: rhombus
I Never said it was over after Iowa.
31 posted on
01/07/2008 12:31:46 PM PST by
Laissez-faire capitalist
(Keep working! Welfare cases and their liberal enablers are counting on you!)
To: rhombus
It ain’t over after one lousy primary. You're right! We have just begun to vote.
37 posted on
01/07/2008 12:36:25 PM PST by
fewz
(Killing tyranny is like killing a snake. If it wiggles, shoot it again.)
To: rhombus
Last night I heard a pundit tell me that if Romney comes in second place in NH, it’s all but over for him. I thought it odd that it would be all but over for someone actually leading in the delegate count. That is how the nominee is selected, isn’t it - by counting the delegates?
122 posted on
01/07/2008 1:16:35 PM PST by
swain_forkbeard
(Rationality may not be sufficient, but it is necessary.)
To: rhombus
Funny how ROMNEY won the Wyoming Primary and nobody has heard about it, huh? Not a big deal like Iowa, I guess.
188 posted on
01/07/2008 6:36:16 PM PST by
Burr5
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson