Posted on 01/07/2008 4:19:05 PM PST by wagglebee
What I should have said is that neither have originated a single piece of cogent legislation outside of pandering resolutions.
All the more honorous for Hitlery, since she is a two term Senator. She still conducts herself as a freshman senator, not having any substantive legislation to her credit. That is why she is losing her primary bid more than anything else.
These people just do the impossible and get worse by the day.
Actually, she favors Chinese style mandatory abortions. For Republicans.
Living in New Hampshire, and being a registered voter, I get a LOT of phone calls from the various parties running for president.
Everytime I get a call from a Democrat, I say that I cannot trust my life or the lives of my family to anybody who cannot recognize the mangled, bloody bodies of “aborted” babies as the murders of human beings.
End of conversation, right there.
well said.
That ought to be a wake-up call to anyone who is truly human. Enough of this shit.
A simple question could decide this, “Which candidate would vote to abort themselves? Let them outbid themselves on that one.
I hope this does deteriorate into a top-this, who’s more pro-abortion competition. With details. Excluding the rabid pro-choicers, most pro-choice Americans are more measured and reluctant in their support than liberals imagine. Support exists in an academic and philosophical sense, in generalities i.e. Touch choice. Tragic circumstance. Who am I to judge. It’s a private matter, etc. An in-your-face celebration of abortion would jar them from that safe distance and a pro-life candidate’s message may fall on more informed hearts.
“Obama voted for a bill in Illinois to allow setting babies aside to die of neglect/exposure/wounds/whatever that survive an abortion.”
I disagree.
Obama, IMHO, voted against a bill that would provide care to babies that survived an abortion. If he had voted YES, he would have actually been condoning abortion.
We shouldn’t have a bill providing enforced care for survivors of abortion, because we shouldn’t even be having abortions based on ‘inconvenience’ for the parent(s).
Hilary is running as Queen Herod.
A: Gennifer Flowers while he was Gov of AR
If Chris Wallace can poke at Guiliani for expenses for his trysts, then it would be fair to ask Hillary if she helped pay for Gennifer's abortion (and possibly others).
When will any media outlet put the question to Hillary regarding the "Clinton's third rail" topic of her marriage, Bill's issues, and her management of the Bimbo Eruption Squad as part of her "experience" in the White House?
Clinton: “Sen. Obama only wants to abort fetuses while they’re in the womb even though a child is more of a burden after it’s born. He doesn’t understand that a woman’s right to choose doesn’t end just because a baby is born. I support abortion until the child reaches the age of 18.”
In a battle of who is the most evil, Hillary will always win.
What is she going to do? Perform a live abortion to prove it?
The Democrat party is the party of evil.
That is some pretty amazing spin.
Actually, the fact that she hasn’t sponsored any significant legislation is one small plus in Mrs. Clinton’s column. I prefer legislators who are inert, and view them as almost ideal presidential material.
However, I fear that Mrs. Clinton wouldn’t remain inert were she to become president.
I think she’s losing the presidential nominating race because, as others have pointed out, the more people see her, the less they like her.
Kinda makes you have more understanding for poor Bill. ;-)
sitetest
Agreed. Now if she had originated some substantive legislation, she might have had some mitigating factors to the dislike she has generated by her Shrilleryness.
One understands more and more why BJ was a cigar dildo arteest, not that her Shrilleryness causes any sympathy for BJ in the least though. Rarely have two people deserved each other more, locked together in the only commonality they likely have, seeking raw power.
Not spin.
Whether he saw it that way or not, I don’t pretend to know.
IIRC, he voted neither way. He voted ‘present’ only, during the vote for that particular issue. The MSM and Hillary are distorting the truth for their own goals.
I believe what I said is true about the reason to vote NO on mandatory care for (inconvenience) abortion survivors.
If you feel that a mother can decide to kill her unborn child, how can you then tell her she can’t kill it 10 minutes later because it survived the original murder attempt? (This is what I would call -spin-)
I don’t feel Obama has the toughness to do what’s good for the country, instead of what’s good for himself, much like the other Dem candidates, and some of the Republicans.
I am more interested in the truth of things than in the persona’s that are created and hyped for my viewing consumption.
If you don't know what his intentions were and aren't certain whether he voted yay, nay or present then it was your opinion entirely and thus most certainly your spin on Obama's position.
The MSM and Hillary are distorting the truth for their own goals.
Could be I haven't heard what the Clinton camp has said about it. I read about it on FR many months ago. My memory is that his vote supported no mandatory care for abortion survivors.
If you feel that a mother can decide to kill her unborn child, how can you then tell her she cant kill it 10 minutes later because it survived the original murder attempt? (This is what I would call -spin-)
No, that could conceivably considered hypocrisy, provided you approved of legalizing abortions in the first place, but it isn't spin. The word spin has a specific definition and that wouldn't fit it.
I am more interested in the truth of things than in the personas that are created and hyped for my viewing consumption.
So am I.
The rate they’re going, they’ll be fighting each other tooth and nail to get into Hell first.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.