Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton to Obama: You're not as Pro-Abortion as Me
LifeSiteNews ^ | 1/7/08 | John Connolly

Posted on 01/07/2008 4:19:05 PM PST by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last
To: sitetest
You are correct.

What I should have said is that neither have originated a single piece of cogent legislation outside of pandering resolutions.

All the more honorous for Hitlery, since she is a two term Senator. She still conducts herself as a freshman senator, not having any substantive legislation to her credit. That is why she is losing her primary bid more than anything else.

21 posted on 01/07/2008 4:48:50 PM PST by Candor7 (Background on Muslim Infiltration of the Pentagon, this is SERIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

These people just do the impossible and get worse by the day.


22 posted on 01/07/2008 4:49:38 PM PST by A_Former_Democrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Actually, she favors Chinese style mandatory abortions. For Republicans.


23 posted on 01/07/2008 4:49:52 PM PST by Lonesome in Massachussets (Being an idealist excuses nothing. Hitler was an idealist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Living in New Hampshire, and being a registered voter, I get a LOT of phone calls from the various parties running for president.

Everytime I get a call from a Democrat, I say that I cannot trust my life or the lives of my family to anybody who cannot recognize the mangled, bloody bodies of “aborted” babies as the murders of human beings.

End of conversation, right there.


24 posted on 01/07/2008 4:51:26 PM PST by Westbrook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
The H-Monster is the biggest special interest panderer on the planet. By MULTIPLE orders of magnitude.
25 posted on 01/07/2008 4:51:47 PM PST by roaddog727 (BS does not get bridges built)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SERKIT
Is this race really down to 'who is the best baby-killer'?

well said.

That ought to be a wake-up call to anyone who is truly human. Enough of this shit.

26 posted on 01/07/2008 4:53:01 PM PST by the invisib1e hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

A simple question could decide this, “Which candidate would vote to abort themselves? Let them outbid themselves on that one.


27 posted on 01/07/2008 4:54:54 PM PST by junta (It's Poltical Correctness stupid! Hold liberals accountable for their actions, a new idea.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

I hope this does deteriorate into a top-this, who’s more pro-abortion competition. With details. Excluding the rabid pro-choicers, most pro-choice Americans are more measured and reluctant in their support than liberals imagine. Support exists in an academic and philosophical sense, in generalities i.e. Touch choice. Tragic circumstance. Who am I to judge. It’s a private matter, etc. An in-your-face celebration of abortion would jar them from that safe distance and a pro-life candidate’s message may fall on more informed hearts.


28 posted on 01/07/2008 4:57:24 PM PST by Eroteme
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

“Obama voted for a bill in Illinois to allow setting babies aside to die of neglect/exposure/wounds/whatever that survive an abortion.”

I disagree.

Obama, IMHO, voted against a bill that would provide care to babies that survived an abortion. If he had voted YES, he would have actually been condoning abortion.

We shouldn’t have a bill providing enforced care for survivors of abortion, because we shouldn’t even be having abortions based on ‘inconvenience’ for the parent(s).


29 posted on 01/07/2008 5:00:39 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Hilary is running as Queen Herod.


30 posted on 01/07/2008 5:00:51 PM PST by agere_contra (Do not confuse the wealth of nations with the wealth of government - FDT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Coleus; nickcarraway; narses; Mr. Silverback; Canticle_of_Deborah; TenthAmendmentChampion; ...
A vote for any Demoncrat and disgustingly at least one Republican is a vote to advance the culture of death.


20 weeks from conception

Please Freepmail me if you want on or off my Pro-Life Ping List.
31 posted on 01/07/2008 5:04:10 PM PST by cpforlife.org (A Catholic Respect Life Curriculum is available at KnightsForLife.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana
Q: How many abortions did the Clintons pay for as a result of Bill’s infidelities?

A: Gennifer Flowers while he was Gov of AR

If Chris Wallace can poke at Guiliani for expenses for his trysts, then it would be fair to ask Hillary if she helped pay for Gennifer's abortion (and possibly others).

When will any media outlet put the question to Hillary regarding the "Clinton's third rail" topic of her marriage, Bill's issues, and her management of the Bimbo Eruption Squad as part of her "experience" in the White House?

32 posted on 01/07/2008 5:06:14 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Clinton: “Sen. Obama only wants to abort fetuses while they’re in the womb even though a child is more of a burden after it’s born. He doesn’t understand that a woman’s right to choose doesn’t end just because a baby is born. I support abortion until the child reaches the age of 18.”

In a battle of who is the most evil, Hillary will always win.


33 posted on 01/07/2008 5:13:19 PM PST by ElectronVolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Clinton to Obama: You're not as Pro-Abortion as Me

What is she going to do? Perform a live abortion to prove it?

The Democrat party is the party of evil.

34 posted on 01/07/2008 5:18:36 PM PST by SkyPilot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
If he had voted YES, he would have actually been condoning abortion.

That is some pretty amazing spin.

35 posted on 01/07/2008 5:26:34 PM PST by TigersEye (Crusty is as Crusty does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Dear Candor7,

Actually, the fact that she hasn’t sponsored any significant legislation is one small plus in Mrs. Clinton’s column. I prefer legislators who are inert, and view them as almost ideal presidential material.

However, I fear that Mrs. Clinton wouldn’t remain inert were she to become president.

I think she’s losing the presidential nominating race because, as others have pointed out, the more people see her, the less they like her.

Kinda makes you have more understanding for poor Bill. ;-)


sitetest

36 posted on 01/07/2008 6:11:26 PM PST by sitetest (If Roe is not overturned, no unborn child will ever be protected in law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: sitetest
I think she’s losing the presidential nominating race because, as others have pointed out, the more people see her, the less they like her.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Agreed. Now if she had originated some substantive legislation, she might have had some mitigating factors to the dislike she has generated by her Shrilleryness.

One understands more and more why BJ was a cigar dildo arteest, not that her Shrilleryness causes any sympathy for BJ in the least though. Rarely have two people deserved each other more, locked together in the only commonality they likely have, seeking raw power.

37 posted on 01/07/2008 6:26:24 PM PST by Candor7 (Background on Muslim Infiltration of the Pentagon, this is SERIES!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TigersEye

Not spin.

Whether he saw it that way or not, I don’t pretend to know.

IIRC, he voted neither way. He voted ‘present’ only, during the vote for that particular issue. The MSM and Hillary are distorting the truth for their own goals.

I believe what I said is true about the reason to vote NO on mandatory care for (inconvenience) abortion survivors.

If you feel that a mother can decide to kill her unborn child, how can you then tell her she can’t kill it 10 minutes later because it survived the original murder attempt? (This is what I would call -spin-)

I don’t feel Obama has the toughness to do what’s good for the country, instead of what’s good for himself, much like the other Dem candidates, and some of the Republicans.

I am more interested in the truth of things than in the persona’s that are created and hyped for my viewing consumption.


38 posted on 01/07/2008 7:20:23 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Just saying what 'they' won't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2
Not spin. Whether he saw it that way or not, I don’t pretend to know.

If you don't know what his intentions were and aren't certain whether he voted yay, nay or present then it was your opinion entirely and thus most certainly your spin on Obama's position.

The MSM and Hillary are distorting the truth for their own goals.

Could be I haven't heard what the Clinton camp has said about it. I read about it on FR many months ago. My memory is that his vote supported no mandatory care for abortion survivors.

If you feel that a mother can decide to kill her unborn child, how can you then tell her she can’t kill it 10 minutes later because it survived the original murder attempt? (This is what I would call -spin-)

No, that could conceivably considered hypocrisy, provided you approved of legalizing abortions in the first place, but it isn't spin. The word spin has a specific definition and that wouldn't fit it.

I am more interested in the truth of things than in the persona’s that are created and hyped for my viewing consumption.

So am I.

39 posted on 01/07/2008 8:14:19 PM PST by TigersEye (Crusty is as Crusty does.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

The rate they’re going, they’ll be fighting each other tooth and nail to get into Hell first.


40 posted on 01/07/2008 9:30:14 PM PST by Deo volente
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson