Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain Sides With Leading Dems on Global Warming (NH voter reminder ALERT)
CNSnews.coom ^ | 5/23/07 | Nathan Burchfiel

Posted on 01/08/2008 7:31:32 AM PST by wilco200

A panel discussion on global climate change Tuesday found Sen. John McCain's (R-Ariz.) staff agreeing with representatives for the leading Democratic presidential contenders. A cap-and-trade system for carbon emissions, they agreed, is the most promising solution to "global warming."

A cap and trade system would involve limits or caps (lower than current levels) on the amount of carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions produced by polluters like power plants. But companies able to cut their CO2 output at a low cost would be able to sell their left-over pollution permits to companies facing higher costs.

John Raidt, a policy advisor to McCain, said during a discussion at the left-leaning Brookings Institution that the Arizona Republican is a "foremost proponent of carbon cap-and-trade."

Raidt said McCain supports a cap-and-trade system above taxes on carbon emissions because "cap-and-trade is a market-driven, proven way."

The position put McCain in league with leading Democratic contenders - Sen. Hillary Clinton of New York, Sen. Barack Obama of Illinois, and former Sen. John Edwards of North Carolina - whose policy advisors also participated in the discussion.

Representatives for the three Democrats said they all support a carbon cap-and-trade system.

Discussion moderator Rick Klein, a reporter for ABC News, said the Brookings Institution invited former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and former New York City Mayor Rudy Giuliani, but representatives declined to attend.

Romney has previously expressed skepticism about global warming "alarmism" - the dramatic predictions for catastrophe if humans continue releasing carbon dioxide into the atmosphere.

As governor of Massachusetts in 2006, Romney pulled out of an agreement with northeastern states that would have committed the states to reducing their carbon emissions through a cap-and-trade system. The retreat has sparked charges of "flip-flopping" against Romney, who had spent years supporting the agreement.

In April, the Carbon Coalition, an environmentalist coalition, quoted Romney as saying, "If there is a carbon cap, I'll make sure it's global and not just domestic." A spokesman for the campaign did not respond to requests for comment Tuesday.

Giuliani's campaign website does not mention global warming or the candidate's energy policy, and a spokesman did not return calls requesting comment Tuesday.

The representatives for Clinton, Obama and Edwards said their candidates agree that cap-and-trade efforts are preferable to a carbon tax. The advisors to Clinton and Obama said nuclear power "should be on the table" as an alternative to fossil fuel-based energy, although they expressed concerns over reactor safety and nuclear waste management.

Edwards "does not think we should be building more nuclear power plants until we resolve the waste question," his advisor James Kvaal said, adding that nuclear power is "never going to be a large part of our solution."

Questioned about the agreement between McCain and the Democratic contenders, Raidt said the candidates agree on the broad approach, but will likely spar over specifics of any plan to address the problem.

"When we get into the details of exactly what's required ... I expect there will be fights," he said, adding that there will be "plenty of time for dissent, healthy dissent."


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: capandtrade; globalwarming; mccain; mccaingore; mccaingwarming; mccainlieberman; nh2008; rino; rinomccain
After McCain Kennedy, McCain Feingold, voting against tax cuts, etc, etc it's inconceivable to me how McCain can get even one vote in a Republican primary...but there it is.

If that hasn't convinced you (NH voters) - remember that McCain also believes that man controls the weather.

McCain should be laughed out of this campaign.

1 posted on 01/08/2008 7:31:33 AM PST by wilco200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wilco200

Quick, name something McCain doesn’t side with the Dems on.


2 posted on 01/08/2008 7:33:50 AM PST by popdonnelly (Get Reid. Salazar, and Harkin out of the Senate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

dittos ... real conservative that McPain. I hope he goes up in flames.


3 posted on 01/08/2008 7:35:01 AM PST by Tarpon (Ignorance, the most expensive commodity produced by mankind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Iraq.

But that won’t make me cast my ballot for McCain today.


4 posted on 01/08/2008 7:35:26 AM PST by dashing doofus (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

Go McCain! Kill the Romney campaign.

Then go off and recycle or collect caps to stop global warming (cooling?) or whatever this nonsense is. You’ll have served your purpose and the Republicans will be through with you.

Or doesn’t McCain know that the South isn’t going to give him a state?


5 posted on 01/08/2008 7:35:33 AM PST by Greg F (Duncan Hunter is a good man.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

:)

6 posted on 01/08/2008 7:35:48 AM PST by ElPatriota (Duncan Hunter 08 -- I am proud to support this man for my president)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

ummm, ummm, ummm, still thinking...


7 posted on 01/08/2008 7:35:55 AM PST by Califreak (Duncan Hunter-no clothespin necessary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

McLame and Huck shouldn’t be getting any serious attention.

I think the shift to Fred, Mitt and rudy will begin tomorrow.


8 posted on 01/08/2008 7:36:32 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

Oh yeah-he said he wants to secure the border./s


9 posted on 01/08/2008 7:37:24 AM PST by Califreak (Duncan Hunter-no clothespin necessary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Califreak

I read your tag. I voted for Hunter early this morning.

I did my part, hopefully others will stick to their conservative convictions and do the same.


10 posted on 01/08/2008 7:37:32 AM PST by wilco200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

“I think the shift to Fred, Mitt and rudy will begin tomorrow.”

Two out of three ain’t bad. Rudy has no hope.


11 posted on 01/08/2008 7:42:47 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: wilco200
Little Johan McCaniac a smooth talking liberal wannabe in a wrinkled old RINO’s skin.
12 posted on 01/08/2008 7:44:56 AM PST by OKIEDOC (Kalifornia, a red state wannabe. I don't take Ex Lax I just read the New York Times.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: wilco200

Cool! One more for the good guys!


14 posted on 01/08/2008 7:48:40 AM PST by Califreak (Duncan Hunter-no clothespin necessary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JackRyanCIA

>The Republican Party has become a White Elephant. pun intended.<

Cheaply bought at garage sale prices! That is so sad.


15 posted on 01/08/2008 7:50:31 AM PST by Califreak (Duncan Hunter-no clothespin necessary!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

Hopefully South Carolina will be mcnutts waterloo.


16 posted on 01/08/2008 7:52:20 AM PST by HANG THE EXPENSE (Defeat liberalism, its the right thing to do for America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wilco200
Is there a real difference between McCain and Obama or Clinton? Except for the Iraq War I don’t see any. I will not vote for McCain under any circumstances.
17 posted on 01/08/2008 7:55:21 AM PST by MBB1984
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wilco200
..... and Romney sides with McCain.

Romney spent $30 million of Massachusetts taxpayers' money on a regional global warming pact before pulling the plug an hour before setting up his run for president.

18 posted on 01/08/2008 7:55:30 AM PST by JohnnyZ ("When we say I saw the PATRIOTS win the WORLD SERIES, it doesn't necessarily mean ...." - Mitt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MBB1984
I will not vote for McCain under any circumstances

Vote for Mr. Shamnesty; no way. Now he sides with Mr. Global Warmed-Over; I don't think so.

19 posted on 01/08/2008 8:03:47 AM PST by sr4402
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: popdonnelly

I was going to say the War, but his constant public trashing of Rumsfield was as demoralizing as anything the Dems did.


20 posted on 01/08/2008 8:04:05 AM PST by NavVet (If you don't defend conservatism in the Primary, you won't have it to defend in the Election)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: wilco200
Image and video hosting by TinyPic

January 7, 2008


21 posted on 01/08/2008 8:06:14 AM PST by La Enchiladita (Wise men seek him still...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: edcoil

Rudy is still a strong adversary, I also hope he gets beat.


22 posted on 01/08/2008 8:27:52 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

[McCain should be laughed out of this campaign.]

He should be laughed or otherwise driven from politics.


23 posted on 01/08/2008 8:51:25 AM PST by dbacks (Taglines for sale or rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wilco200
chilling..


24 posted on 01/08/2008 9:38:15 AM PST by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... ICE’s toll-free tip hotline —1-866-DHS-2-ICE ... 9/11 .. Never FoRGeT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

I read your tag. I voted for Hunter early this morning.

I did my part, hopefully others will stick to their conservative convictions and do the same.


Florida begins early voting Monday....so DH gets another vote next week!


25 posted on 01/08/2008 9:46:01 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Got Delegates? Hunter does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: All

I bet McAmnesty would pick Hillary as his running mate


26 posted on 01/08/2008 9:56:20 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Got Delegates? Hunter does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

Remember back 2 debates ago. The question was asked, “raise your hand if you believe Global Warming is a serious problem and if Man is the cause? Before Fred Thompson saved their butts and stopped the question, four hands were going up - Mitt, Rudy, Huckabee, and McCain.

There is no question all four of them along with President Bush have fallen for the Man Cause Global Warming scam. McCain however has fallen for it with a passion.

I will be the first to say it right here. In a McCain White House Al Gore will be appointed to a cabinet position.


27 posted on 01/08/2008 10:01:09 AM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wilco200; OKSooner; honolulugal; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; gruffwolf; ...

FReepmail me to get on or off


Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown

New!!: Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH

Ping me if you find one I've missed.


done-for.
28 posted on 01/08/2008 1:15:30 PM PST by xcamel (FDT/2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Defendingliberty; WL-law; Normandy
"Hot Air Cult"

~~Anthropogenic Global Warming ™ ping~~

29 posted on 01/08/2008 4:08:10 PM PST by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wilco200; 11B40; A Balrog of Morgoth; A message; ACelt; Aeronaut; AFPhys; AlexW; America_Right; ...
DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Columnist argues 'global warming has stopped'

Federal Department of Toilets & Light Bulbs

New rule for high profile papers

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News Site

Latest from Greenie Watch

Latest from Junk Science

CO2 Science, Vol. 11, No. 2

Latest from Terra Daily

30 posted on 01/08/2008 7:25:01 PM PST by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (I resolve to remember to write "08" on my checks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wilco200
I read your tag. I voted for Hunter early this morning. I did my part, hopefully others will stick to their conservative convictions and do the same.

Smile. I read your post and it is the thing that brings a smile to my face. Congratulations you did real GOOD today.

31 posted on 01/08/2008 7:28:21 PM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wilco200
it's inconceivable to me how McCain can get even one vote in a Republican primary.

Too many idiots voting.

This nation is doomed, its all over but the shouting, the decline started in the late 1950's and is now irreversible.

The Socialists have won, the coup de grace was motor voter further expanding the right to vote to illegal aliens.

The Founding fathers warned against this.

Who Voted in Early America?

Voting Before the Revolution

For the most part, American colonists adopted the voter qualifications that they had known in England. Typically, a voter had to be a free, adult, male resident of his county, a member of the predominant religious group, and a "freeholder." A freeholder owned land worth a certain amount of money. Colonists believed only freeholders should vote because only they had a permanent stake in the stability of society. Freeholders also paid the bulk of the taxes. Other persons, as the famous English lawyer William Blackstone put it, "are in so mean a situation as to be esteemed to have no will of their own."

Becoming a freeholder was not difficult for a man in colonial America since land was plentiful and cheap. Thus up to 75 percent of the adult males in most colonies qualified as voters. But this voting group fell far short of a majority of the people then living in the English colonies. After eliminating everyone under the age of 21, all slaves and women, most Jews and Catholics, plus those men too poor to be freeholders, the colonial electorate consisted of perhaps only 10 percent to 20 percent of the total population.

The act of voting in colonial times was quite different from today. In many places, election days were social occasions accompanied by much eating and drinking. When it came time to vote, those qualified would simply gather together and signify their choices by voice or by standing up. As time went on, this form of public voting was gradually abandoned in favor of secret paper ballots. For a while, however, some colonies required published lists showing how each voter cast his ballot.

Voting fraud and abuses were common in the colonies. Sometimes large landowners would grant temporary freeholds to landless men who then handed the deeds back after voting. Individuals were paid to vote a certain way or paid not to vote at all. Corrupt voting officials would allow unqualified persons to vote while denying legitimate voters the right to cast their ballots. Intimidation and threats, even violence, were used to persuade people how to vote. Ballots were faked, purposely miscounted, "lost," and destroyed.

After declaring independence on July 4, 1776, each former English colony wrote a state constitution. About half the states attempted to reform their voting procedures. The trend in these states was to do away with the freehold requirement in favor of granting all taxpaying, free, adult males the right to vote. Since few men escaped paying taxes of some sort, suffrage (the right to vote) expanded in these states. Vermont's constitution went even further in 1777 when it became the first state to grant universal manhood suffrage (i.e., all adult males could vote). Some states also abolished religious tests for voting. It was in New Jersey that an apparently accidental phrase in the new state constitution permitted women to vote in substantial numbers for the first time in American history.

"Of Government in Petticoats!!!"

The provision on suffrage in the New Jersey state constitution of 1776 granted the right to vote to "all inhabitants" who were of legal age (21), owned property worth 50 English pounds (not necessarily a freehold), and resided in a county for at least one year. No one is sure what was meant by "all inhabitants" since the New Jersey constitutional convention was held in secret. But it appears that no agitation for woman suffrage occurred at the convention.

After the state constitution was ratified by the voters (presumably only men voted), little comment on the possibility of women voting took place in the state for 20 years. Even so, one state election law passed in 1790 included the words "he or she." It is unclear how many, or if any, women actually voted during this time.

In 1797, a bitter contest for a seat in the New Jersey state legislature erupted between John Condict, a Jeffersonian Republican from Newark, and William Crane, a Federalist from Elizabeth. Condict won the election, but only by a narrow margin after Federalists from Elizabeth turned out a large number of women to vote for Crane. This was probably the first election in U.S. history in which a substantial group of women went to the polls.

Newspaper coverage of women voting was widespread in the state and included the publication of a new song titled, "The Freedom of Election." The sarcastic last verse illustrates pretty much what the attitude of most New Jersey men must have been:

Then freedom hail! thy powers prevail o'er prejudice and error; No longer shall man tyrannize, and rule the world in terror: Now one and all, proclaim the fall of Tyrants! - Open wide your throats, And welcome in the peaceful scene, of government in petticoats!!!

New Jersey newspapers debated whether the state constitution really intended for women to vote. Some argued that the words "all inhabitants" surely did not include children, slaves, and foreigners. If this were the case, they continued, women should not be allowed to vote either because they never had before. Others maintained that perhaps widows and single women who owned property worth 50 pounds should be able to vote. Married women were automatically excluded from voting since at this time all property in a marriage legally belonged to the husband.

One New Jersey opponent of woman suffrage wrote in 1799, "It is evident, that women, generally, are neither, by nature, nor habit, nor education, nor by their necessary condition in society, fitted to perform this duty [of voting] with credit to themselves, or advantage to the public."

In 1806, Newark and Elizabeth again faced off at the polls, this time over the site of a new county courthouse. During three days of voting, partisans from both towns used every legal and illegal device to gather the most votes. Men and boys, white and black, citizens and aliens, residents and non-residents, voted (often many times). Women and girls, married and single, with and without property, joined the election frenzy. Finally, males dressed up as females and voted one more time.

Newark, with 1,600 qualified voters, counted over 5,000 votes; Elizabeth, with 1,000 legal voters, counted more than 2,200 votes. Although Newark claimed victory, the voting was so blatantly fraudulent that the state legislature canceled the election.

The following year, the state legislature passed a new election law to clear up the confusion over who was qualified to vote in New Jersey. The law declared that since it was "highly necessary to the safety, quiet, good order, and dignity of the state," no persons were to be allowed to vote except free white men who either owned property worth 50 pounds or were taxpayers. Such voters would also have to be citizens and residents of the county where they voted. The campaign for this new election law was led by John Condict, the legislator who was nearly defeated in 1797 when many women voted for his opponent. Thus, in 1807, with little debate in the all-male state legislature, and no public protest from the state's female population, the experiment with woman suffrage in New Jersey came to an end.

Expanding the Right to Vote

Although for a time some states like New Jersey wanted to limit suffrage, the trend throughout U.S. history has been to expand the right to vote. At first, the main debate was over property tests. But by the Civil War, most states had replaced the freehold and other property requirements with universal white manhood suffrage or something close to it.

With the end of slavery, reformers turned to securing the right to vote for black freedmen. While this was accomplished constitutionally with the ratification of the 15th Amendment in 1870, another century passed before discrimination against black voters was finally suppressed. Women did not win the right to vote until the adoption of the 19th Amendment in 1920, over 100 years after women lost the vote in New Jersey.

In 1964, the 24th Amendment prohibited denying anyone the right to vote in federal elections for failing to pay a voting or any other tax. Finally, in 1971, the 26th Amendment reduced the legal voting age to 18 in all elections.

32 posted on 01/08/2008 7:44:14 PM PST by Rome2000 (Peace is not an option)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dashing doofus; popdonnelly
Iraq.

You know what though? Every time I hear McCain is a strong national defense candidate, I think of his enthusiastic support of our southern border invasion and the shamnesty he wants to offer the invaders and I think no, he's not a strong defense candidate. He's as weak as they come.

33 posted on 01/08/2008 7:49:45 PM PST by GATOR NAVY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rome2000

All I can hope for now is more divisiveness. If we can get back to the Constitution we matter as well have a government that is in complete gridlock where nothing gets done.

In addition to not voting for any candidate who is pro-illegal alien or a global warming nut. I will not vote for anyone who utters the words “reach across the aisle” or bi-partisin


34 posted on 01/08/2008 8:01:18 PM PST by wilco200
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: wilco200

Poll to freep:

Are you concerned about global warming?

http://www.nbc5.com/index.html

Scroll down right side of page.


35 posted on 01/09/2008 5:20:33 AM PST by KeyLargo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson