Skip to comments.
The Histone Code (genetic code not the only code?)
USC/Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center ^
| 2007
| Judd C. Rice, Ph.D.
Posted on 01/08/2008 7:28:22 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-212 next last
To: GodGunsGuts
So, the more we know, the more we don’t know.............
2
posted on
01/08/2008 7:31:08 PM PST
by
PeterPrinciple
( Seeking the truth here folks.)
To: DaveLoneRanger; editor-surveyor; CottShop; boop; betty boop; metmom; Alamo-Girl; js1138; ...
To: GodGunsGuts
I need Hildebeast, the smartest woman on the planet, to explain this to me!
To: GodGunsGuts
Very interesting, but the article looks like good basic science.
It will not help creationism one bit. Sorry.
5
posted on
01/08/2008 7:37:39 PM PST
by
Coyoteman
(Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.)
To: PeterPrinciple
I would say, the more we learn how “fine-tuned” life is, the more we should be looking for the possibility of a “fine-tuner.”
To: PeterPrinciple; GodGunsGuts
the more we know, the more we dont know Bump
7
posted on
01/08/2008 7:40:31 PM PST
by
valkyry1
(Thompson/Hunter Hunter/Thompson all the way!)
To: GodGunsGuts
8
posted on
01/08/2008 7:44:11 PM PST
by
doc1019
(Rabbit and the Hare … Fred ‘08)
To: PeterPrinciple
So, the more we know, the more we dont know
So, the more we know, the more we realize how much we dont know.
To: GodGunsGuts
Thank you for the ping. It's always good to hear from you. I don't always get back to you on this or that ping, but I always do, eventually if not sooner, read the article, follow the thread, etc.
Let's see...how did it go? From previous info; proteins could vary somewhat, depending on what other neighboring alleles were present, or not? Something like that.
It's as if there are codes, within the code? As opposed to being simply "here's the gene that makes this protein" [with no variation, period].
10
posted on
01/08/2008 7:46:18 PM PST
by
BlueDragon
(never set out to sea on a boat that has shiny pump handles...)
To: valkyry1
Thanks, Valkyryl. Did you notice that part about “fine-tuning” of gene expression? It would seem that certain materialist/reductionist explanations for life are unraveling by the day.
To: BlueDragon
I just wonder how many codes we will find as we go forward. Codes upon codes upon codes...We truly are fearfully and WONDERFULLY made!
To: Coyoteman
It will not help creationism one bit. Sorry.
Aah, come on. Do you have to be such a one-trick pony? Such a one note Johnny? (three cord wonder?)
You're deeper than that. I've even seen you be that way, a time or two... 8^)
13
posted on
01/08/2008 7:53:30 PM PST
by
BlueDragon
(never set out to sea on a boat that has shiny pump handles...)
To: Coyoteman
==It will not help creationism one bit.
God’s creation does not need the help of science. Quite the contrary...Science needs God’s creation.
To: GodGunsGuts
Yeah. Sure does seem that way.
Now, back to our regularly scheduled program ---
(I'd better go follow the link and read the article, lol!)
15
posted on
01/08/2008 7:56:43 PM PST
by
BlueDragon
(never set out to sea on a boat that has shiny pump handles...)
To: PeterPrinciple
That’s what I noticed in college, even in all my meteorology courses. Every thing we learned raised a whole host of questions that still needed to be answered.
16
posted on
01/08/2008 8:16:41 PM PST
by
metmom
(Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
To: metmom
Isn’t God’s creation fascinating!
To: metmom
PS Remember that article I posted about the “Guinea Pig Kids”?
To: GodGunsGuts
A code is a basic construct of language. Only intelligent beings use language. If biology has built in codes, it implies an intelligent code giver created it all. Seems rather intuitive to me.
19
posted on
01/08/2008 8:28:17 PM PST
by
garjog
(Used to be liberals were just people to disagree with. Now they are a threat to our existence.)
To: garjog
Same here. But some FRevolutionists find this intuitive notion highly controversial...even anathema. Indeed, they have gone so far as to say that evolution is the study of natural phenomena that give the “appearance” of design. They remind me of Buddhists who seek to convince mankind that all is illusion. They have even adopted a kind of yin and yang (random mutation plus natural selection).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 201-212 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson