Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NVDave
They should have done the same with Alaska. The land was purchased with federal money and belonged to everyone in all the states.
18 posted on 01/09/2008 8:01:21 PM PST by Mark was here (Hard work never killed anyone, but why take the chance?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: Mark was here
They should have done the same with Alaska.

They did more than that. The Federal Goverment owns most of the mineral rights AND most of the surface in Alaska. The State Goverment owns a much smaller but significant portion, about 28%. The natives were awarded about 11% of the land and mineral rights. Private ownerships of land is Alaska is less than 1% of the state.

Land Ownership in Alaska, with map
http://www.conservationgiscenter.org/maps/html/landown.html

http://library.state.ak.us/is/faq/FARQlandownership.html

19 posted on 01/10/2008 4:40:26 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Mark was here

The federal ownership of the land and mineral rights is the reasons most of the oil in Alaska is NOT being produced. The majority of the oil production in Alaska is on the state owned land and native land where oil exploration and production is typically encouraged. Federal Lands include the coastal plain of ANWR, that was specifically set aside to be explored for oil production but has been held up.


21 posted on 01/10/2008 4:43:22 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson