[harpo11]

I'm certainly sure that if the working women of New Hampshire, and the rest of the United States really knew how pampered, spoiled, and so accustomed to other people doing the hard work for Mrs. Clinton and to see the luxury she lives in, never having to find her own parking place, never having to wait in endless lines to travel, filling her own car with gas, washing her own clothes, dusting, cooking, washing floors and cleaning toilets, they'd have never fallen for Mrs. clinton's contrived emotional act.

She is so used to commanding others to do her bidding from driving her to wherever she needs to go, spending whatever she wants on clothing, purses, shoes, hair and make-up. Never worrying how is she going to pay the electric bill, and having enough money to buy groceries.

Frankly, any female voter that fell for Mrs. Clinton's calculated emotion, should be insulted rather than feeling sympathy for her. She has afterall planned and dreamed ambitiously for this moment and the only thing that could possibly make her cry is the prospect of losing.

[Timeout]

SOmething just occurred to me. I was reading the article at Politco, “Race roils Dem campaign”.

Suddenly I recalled Monday afternoon when I first saw/heard Hillary’s tears. It happened to be shortly after the Martin Luther King comments had started making the rounds. My instant reaction was that the crying was a ploy to knock the MLK remarks out of the news.

With all the commentary since then (her softer side, she found her voice, blah blah blah) I’d forgotten about that. But reading Politico brought it back to me.

I think her campaign instantly recognized the damage that could be done by her disparaging Dr. King. I think the tears were deliberate and they were meant to blanket the news so the MLK story would get buried.