[trumandogz]

So his “friends”, the enablers who sold him the drugs, or provided them to him for free, getting him hooked, were just supporting his right to “choose”.

The person that sold him the drugs is not responsible for his death just as a gun dealer is not responsible if a gun he sells is used by a customer to commit suicide.

[zipper]

Another flawed analogy. The liberal-tarians are really slow today.

As before when I said motorcycles are legal, and not addictive. I have one. Selling guns is legal — dealers are licensed. Guns are not physically addictive. I have several.

There is a reason ILLEGAL drugs are ILLEGAL.

Surely you can come up with a better analogy — maybe even one that makes sense?