[PetroniusMaximus]

“Still backtracking, I see. Show me where Mitt Romney endorsed $50 abortions.”

You, apparently, are a person who doesn’t like to face facts. Mass. state law doesn't "mandate" that abortions be offered at the incredibly low, low price of $50.But Mitt's plan does! The plan he toured & touted & preened about.

“Erick points out also that Romney vetoed portions of that plan using the line-item veto as Governor. But clearly, he did not veto making abortion just as cheap as possible. Just $50 to take an innocent human life — Romney’s plan — Romney’s position less than 1000 days ago.”

http://www.blogsforfredthompson.com/romney-massachusetts-health-plan-included-50-abortions

[Hoodat]

As I already said, that is in accordance with a Massachusetts Supreme Court Decision handed down in 1981, and reaffirmed in 1997 - a FACT you choose to ignore.

You have already shown yourself to be a shill for Thompson. I am OK with that. But your attack on Romney is uncalled for. btw, have you been pro-life since birth?