Skip to comments.
Ronald Reagan's Favorite Paper Endorses Fred Thompson
Red State ^
| 1/12/08
Posted on 01/11/2008 11:19:46 PM PST by ellery
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
"Ronald Reagan" -- drink!
Joking aside, this is a big one.
1
posted on
01/11/2008 11:19:47 PM PST
by
ellery
To: ellery
This is a solid endorsement for Thompson.
To: Politicalmom; jellybean; 2ndDivisionVet; Josh Painter
Some brief historical context on the significance of this endorsement.
3
posted on
01/11/2008 11:21:11 PM PST
by
ellery
("I like mandates!" - Mitt Romney, January 5, 2008)
To: ellery
If Fred becomes the next president, does that mean I have to return to the church? ;) (see tagline)
4
posted on
01/11/2008 11:25:52 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Pro-Life atheist who will vote Fred in the primary, Republican in November)
To: ellery
A great endorsement for Fred, in the same ballpark as Mitt’s National Review endorsement.
To: ellery
Seems to me that Thompson has been picking up the backing of a number of solid people and organizations over the last week. Very good. With the New York Times even giving him some favorable press, it just may be that Thompson will peak at the right time. Good luck Fred. We need you bud.
6
posted on
01/11/2008 11:28:52 PM PST
by
DoughtyOne
(< fence >< sound immigration policies >< /weasles >< /RINOs >< /Reagan wannabees that are liberal >)
To: americanophile
Correction:
This is a solid ( Conservative ) endorsement for Thompson.
7
posted on
01/11/2008 11:33:18 PM PST
by
Prophet in the wilderness
(PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
To: Prophet in the wilderness
FRED was the only choice for this prestigous publication.
FRED is going to pull this off. Hell of a strategy!
8
posted on
01/11/2008 11:38:47 PM PST
by
Bobbisox
(ALL AMERICAN FredHead FREEPER! [FRED ain't DEAD, ENOUGH SAID!])
To: Darkwolf377
If Fred becomes the next president, does that mean I have to return to the church? ;) (see tagline)
You know what I don’t believe in? athiest!!!!
9
posted on
01/11/2008 11:42:50 PM PST
by
garylmoore
(Faith is the assurance of things unseen.)
To: garylmoore
Well, I’m sorry—does that mean my vote for Fred won’t count? :(
10
posted on
01/11/2008 11:43:25 PM PST
by
Darkwolf377
(Pro-Life atheist who will vote Fred in the primary, Republican in November)
To: Darkwolf377
Absolutely not! Vote FRED!
11
posted on
01/11/2008 11:46:22 PM PST
by
FightforFreedomCA
(Fred Storm Rising - Thompson in '08)
To: Darkwolf377
:) Our guy doesn’t do mandates. But if it happens, there will certainly be much rejoicing!
12
posted on
01/11/2008 11:49:21 PM PST
by
ellery
To: Darkwolf377
Ignore the Thumper ...Vote Fred FRiend ....
13
posted on
01/11/2008 11:51:46 PM PST
by
Neu Pragmatist
(Just say No to McPain and No to Flip Romney .....VOTE FRED ... Thank you :))
To: Darkwolf377
LOL!
Your vote will count.
It’s the rest of your “life” you might reconsider.
But...that’s just me. ;o)
14
posted on
01/11/2008 11:54:37 PM PST
by
dixiechick2000
(There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
To: JohnBovenmyer
“A great endorsement for Fred, in the same ballpark as Mitts National Review endorsement.”
It is surprising how the National Review endorsement seems so out dated now. It wasn’t more than a few weeks ago, but with the primaries and debates, it seems a distant past, today’s endorsement is very fresh and indicative of the candidate’s progress among the base.
15
posted on
01/11/2008 11:55:28 PM PST
by
ansel12
(Washington:I cannot tell a lie,Clinton:I cannot tell the truth,Romney:I cannot tell the difference.)
To: ellery
I saw a thread about this endorsement this morning.
Some on the thread had never heard of Human Events.
Others didn’t understand the significance of this endorsement.
I do...and I was disappointed in the comments on that thread.
16
posted on
01/11/2008 11:58:12 PM PST
by
dixiechick2000
(There ought to be one day-- just one-- when there is open season on senators. ~~ Will Rogers)
To: Neu Pragmatist; All
“Ignore the Thumper ...Vote Fred FRiend ....”
Not only that, but FRED SUPPORTS MUST DONATE! IF THE MSM WILL PROMOTE THEIR DOG, WE HAVE TO SUPPORT OUR LEADERS! OUR VOICE, OUR VOTE, AND OUR DONATION!
17
posted on
01/12/2008 12:02:15 AM PST
by
Rick_Michael
(The Anti-Federalists failed....so will the Anti-Frederalists)
To: Rick_Michael
Amen , Preach it Brother !
18
posted on
01/12/2008 12:03:37 AM PST
by
Neu Pragmatist
(Just say No to McPain and No to Flip Romney .....VOTE FRED ... Thank you :))
To: americanophile
I will support Thompson on the ticket as Vice President to another conservative.
19
posted on
01/12/2008 12:26:20 AM PST
by
AmericanInTokyo
(Why should RINOs ask for my vote in November when they & MSM screwed True Conservatives?)
To: Neu Pragmatist
This is great for momentum...
This is where conservatives need to make their stand, or we go out with a whimper and loose control of a national party.
I donated last Sunday and again last night - always rewarding performance.
20
posted on
01/12/2008 12:47:52 AM PST
by
TexasGunRunner
(I'm in Iraq, I'm not going anywhere, deal with it.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-39 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson