Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: barryg
Well, I am sure all the rest wish they'd run such a "very poor camnpaign" which has resulted in having the highest number of delegates and competitive poll numbers in most of the early states.

Has it been a perfect campaign? Of course not. But nobody else has been savaged in the MSM like Mitt has been. And, to date, nobody else has had his record, or decades old statements, scrutinized in the same fashion. Being the early frontrunner with the biggest target on him, Mitt's had to wage a two-front battle against his opponents and the MSM. He's held up pretty well.

Also, we could argue that Iowa and NH were not true tests of his strength. In Iowa we saw an unprecedented number of first-time evangelical voters turn out and in NH we saw democrats and independents vote for McCain (it's unclear whether they actually support McCain or were just attempting to weaken Romney). In one of the most conservative states, Wyoming, Mitt won by a large margin.

Given the fact that it's an open primary in MI, I don't think MI is do or die for Mitt either. People are not stupid (well, not all of the people) and they can see what is going on with the cross-over voting.

77 posted on 01/12/2008 11:30:43 AM PST by redgirlinabluestate (Unite 4 Mitt - Stop Rudy, Huck & McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]


To: redgirlinabluestate

I love the argument that Mitt is a good candidate because he is unable to get Independent’s votes.

I want someone who can get independent votes, it’s the only way we can win in November.


82 posted on 01/12/2008 12:17:32 PM PST by barryg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson