Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BillF; dbacks
Several court decisions here in NJ have basically made refusal to submit to an alcohol test equivalent to an admission of guilt. It varies from state to state, but if you follow BillF's link, you will see that it is an admission of guilt elsewhere in everything but name.

This is NOT true, btw, with the "pre-tests" ie walking a straight line, touching nose, etc. In most states, you CAN refuse due to the lack of effectiveness of such tests in determining intoxication.

42 posted on 01/12/2008 11:45:44 AM PST by Clemenza (Ronald Reagan was a "Free Traitor", Like Me ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: Clemenza

[evidence of drunk driving].

Note it is evidence, not proof. Bloodshot, watery eyes is also evidence. Both are refutable and it MUST be proven beyond a reasonable doubt. That is hardly an admission of guilt.


74 posted on 01/12/2008 4:12:41 PM PST by dbacks (Taglines for sale or rent.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson