Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/12/2008 10:26:27 AM PST by tobyhill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: tobyhill
--amazing , from Newsweak--
2 posted on 01/12/2008 10:34:59 AM PST by rellimpank (--don't believe anything the MSM tells you about firearms or explosives--NRA Benefactor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Whats that noise? Ah liberal heads exploding everywhere because of a “lame duck” President. I have great respect for this man. He is willing to put the country and what he thinks is right above all else.


3 posted on 01/12/2008 10:37:31 AM PST by Harry Pothead (One issue voter, who wil kill islamofacists?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
Looks like ol’ dumbass Chimpy snookered the liberal geniuses again.
5 posted on 01/12/2008 10:49:54 AM PST by shove_it (and have a nice day)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

like as had been said before, Bush plays chess the rest play checkers! Don’t sit down and play poker with this man, he will clean your clock!


8 posted on 01/12/2008 12:15:45 PM PST by Jewels1091
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill
The MSM always considered Mr. Bush as a “lame duck” president. As noted on Newsbusters, they’ve taken Iraq out of the headlines and now use the economy worries to focus on. The Money Phrases from the article:(emphasis added)

Last month, Sen. Hillary Clinton urged Bush not to commit to any such agreement without congressional approval. The president said nothing about that on Saturday, but Lute said last fall that the Iraqi agreement would not likely rise to the level of a formal treaty requiring Senate ratification. Even so, it would be difficult if not impossible for future presidents to unilaterally breach such a pact.......

And as in Japan, Germany, Korea and Kuwait, they include a substantial troop presence. Far away in the Persian Gulf, Bush is creating facts on the ground that the next president may not be able to ignore.

10 posted on 01/12/2008 7:18:13 PM PST by bobsunshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

Misunderestimated.


12 posted on 01/13/2008 4:51:22 AM PST by flynmudd (Proud Navy Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

pwned.


15 posted on 01/14/2008 1:48:38 AM PST by counterpunch (GOP Convention '08 — Go For Brokered!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

ttt


16 posted on 01/14/2008 9:26:10 AM PST by stickman20089
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

I have a question....in reading responses elsewhere to this why would the democrats be mad that Bush is trying to finish what he had started when all along they compalined that he’ll leave the Iraq mess for the “next guy”?


18 posted on 01/14/2008 12:09:31 PM PST by amutr22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: tobyhill

What? You mean the President is not following the drive-by media’s quagmire scenario/suggestions? Way to go W!


22 posted on 01/14/2008 12:28:29 PM PST by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life :o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson