Starving our schools? I dont see any starving teachers around here. Energy independence? You mean the wells we havent drilled in years?
To: fieldmarshaldj; LdSentinal; Norman Bates; George W. Bush; Kuksool; AuH2ORepublican; MplsSteve
Kleeb seems like a good campaigner. In the general election, he may win as much as 45% of the vote.
2 posted on
01/12/2008 2:09:57 PM PST by
Clintonfatigued
(You can't be serious about national security unless you're serious about border security)
To: stan_sipple
Stirs? I wish he’d use a blender.
6 posted on
01/12/2008 2:37:57 PM PST by
NonValueAdded
(Fred Dalton Thompson for President)
To: stan_sipple
For too long as a country, weve talked about benefits without talking about burdens. Yeah, your benefits, my burden. @$$holes.
7 posted on
01/12/2008 2:39:47 PM PST by
Hardastarboard
(DemocraticUnderground.com is an internet hate site.)
To: stan_sipple
Sounds like it's right out of the Socialism 101 Handbook - "benefits without burdens" sounds like higher taxes to me.
Candidate Dweeb will get beaten like a rented mule in Nebraska. Too bad that the he'll be beaten by another RINO.
9 posted on
01/12/2008 3:01:02 PM PST by
Hat-Trick
(Do you trust a government that cannot trust you with guns?)
To: stan_sipple
I just laugh whenever anyone talks about uniting, ‘bridging old divides’, etc, etc.
It appeals to moderates who may decide to melt and politically sing ‘kumbaya’ with em’, they hold these few up as examples of how everyone’s ‘united’, and the vast majority of the rest of us who don’t buy this crap become ‘the haters’, those against progress, those who want to divide and break us, etc etc. Total Alinsky method here.
I don’t want to be fake united with people who are so totally opposite me. The only way I want to be united with them is if they become conservative and we actually believe the same things on most important issues.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson