Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen

Hey, if you’re going to use the inclusive 35% rate when spaking of the income tax, plase use the comparable inclusive FT rate of 23% for consistency’s sake. Thanks.

Either that, or quote the income tax rate in exclusive terms.


69 posted on 01/13/2008 7:26:55 AM PST by ovrtaxt (In my fantasy world, the Dems run a Zell Miller/ Lieberman ticket...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: ovrtaxt
"Hey, if you’re going to use the inclusive 35% rate when spaking of the income tax, plase use the comparable inclusive FT rate of 23% for consistency’s sake. Thanks."

I was being consistent. I was comparing the perceived benefits of tax avoidance.

Avoiding income taxes gives a perceived benefit of 35%, does it not? I earn $10 million. I owe $3.5 million. If I cheat I benefit in the amount of 35% do I not?

Under the Fair Tax, the item costs me $100. That includes $23 in Fair Tax, does it not? If I cheat, I only pay $77, correct? That means I avoided the 30% in sales taxes that were added to the price.

Now, if you want me to use 23% I will. But only if you stop calling it a sales tax. Calling it a sales tax means that if I cheat I save the sales tax which is 30%.

It's about perceived savings.

98 posted on 01/13/2008 8:17:43 AM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson