Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: nicmarlo
Peaceful protest does not limit one to being mute or speaking softly. Unless criminal behavior occurs, the Supreme Court has ruled that protests are covered under the Bill of Rights. Protesters may have to file a fee to gather in groups, but show me where SCOTUS has determined that gatherings cannot occur unless people are quiet.

thank you for pointing this out. I am reminded that in the British politiical tradition. or so it was until PC, smothered it, opponents were free to make loud noises and to interrupt others. Watch any debate in the House of Commons and one sees very "rude" behavior. Now the unstated rule is. however, is that there will; be exchanges: a mob cannot be allowed to shout down the speaker unless he has been given a chance but unable to respond effectively. Piling on IS allowed.

205 posted on 01/13/2008 3:35:12 PM PST by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]


To: RobbyS

I dare say, SCOTUS has never issued any kind of decision that states: “legal protesters” SHALL behave in a “quiet and gentlemanly” way.


213 posted on 01/13/2008 3:38:52 PM PST by nicmarlo (I hereby declare my support for Duncan Hunter. 1/10/08; late to the party, but I have arrived!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson