Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee; KeithCu

Then on what basis are police called to haul off protesters when they become so harrassing that the person cannot speak and the rally cannot continue?

On what basis can cities require permits for protesters and draw up “no protest” zones for certain events?

I would be careful telling others that they are “seriously misinformed.”

The First Amendment right to speak is not absolute, nor is any other constitutional right.

And, besides, this is not about what is legal or constitutional. It’s about what is helpful or beneficial to the pro-life cause. I’m sure you have some teaching somewhere that just because something is “allowed,” that does not mean it is good to do it.


90 posted on 01/13/2008 2:48:52 PM PST by fightinJAG ("Tell the truth. The Pajama People are watching you.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: fightinJAG
The First Amendment right to speak is not absolute, nor is any other constitutional right.

You are absolutely correct.

The First Amendment right to speak is denied to those in the womb that are viable. Or just ready to be born.

Their voices are not heard as they are brutally tortured and killed in the womb.

They are also denied their Constitutional Right to Life.

How loud do you think they would scream at Pro Abortion people?

Oh, that's right.

That would be harassing.

It wouldn't be "helpful or beneficial to the pro-life cause."

Some feel compelled to speak for those that cannot speak for themselves.

Steven Pokorny:... "A third of my generation is dead..."

He's speaking for millions of innocents slaughtered.

362 posted on 01/13/2008 7:50:48 PM PST by Syncro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson