PETER RESPONDS
My contention is-
Hillary has caused successive false and illegal FEC reports to be filed between 2000 and 2006 to hide from the public that she intentionally lied - through her spokesman Howard Wolfson-in her two responses to Washington Post inquiries about her relationship with me and my contributions to her campaign. She said in August, 2000 to the Post that she had taken no money whatsoever from me and vowed not to take any money from me- one month after she and Bill Clinton solicited and coordinated my personal expenditure of more than $1.2 million (as confirmed by the DOJ in te May, 2005 trial of Hillary’s finance director) and before she demanded payment via multiple fax’s of another $100,000 to benefit her campaign through illegally hiding my contribution in a state committee using untraceable securities.
What is fundamental to this whole matter is that Hillary and Bill Clinton illegally solicited an excessive $1.2 million federal contribution to her campaign from me and then hid that fact from the voters in false statements to the media about me, in false attributions of $100,000 contributions by Stan Lee and Stan Lee Media, in a series of false FEC reports and false statements and to all government agencies that inquired about it.
That contention is the crux of my case to the FEC against Hillary, which has enabled Hillary to hide my identity and my $1.2 million personal contribution, for which the DOJ prosecuted David Rosen for denying the public’s right to know this information.
I just had a thought that I’d like to see - Peter Paul on Oprah!