Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: houstonman58
I'll do as I please.

No one forced Mittens to sign the law, except it was his baby all along, and if he had to sell us down the socialist river for his ambition, he would, and did.

Mittens; “I don’t know what’s going to happen down the road as the Democrats get their hands on it,”

Is there any conservitve that wouldn't know what the Democrats would do with more power? Is Mittens stupid?

15 posted on 01/14/2008 4:57:29 PM PST by Leisler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Leisler
"No one forced Mittens to sign the law,---"

Then you don't understand our government and how it works, especially in a State that has an 85% Democrat senate. Mitt's vetos were all easily overridden in the state senate. So when you claim he had could have vetoed the bill in its final form, I submit to you that you're quite wrong. His veto would have been just another meaningless token. Half the liberal Massachusetts senate could stay home and there would still be enough votes to veto the Republican Governor of Massachusetts.

Mitt is no socialist my friend, he made a literal fortune in the free market system, and I know from being a Massachusetts resident that he was always at odds with the liberal democrats here. They hated him. He didn't win much, but with an 85% Democrat senate and a completely Democrat State Supreme Court, how could he?

18 posted on 01/15/2008 10:42:08 AM PST by houstonman58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson