[CedarDave]

California contends that its law, which would have forced automakers to cut emissions of carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases by 30 percent in new cars and light trucks by 2016, is stronger and takes effect more quickly than the new federal law.

I guess we'll all have to have drive Flintstone pedal cars to be able to meet these standards. Laws of physics don't apply to Democrats and enviro-nazis.

[BenLurkin]

House Democrat said Monday he plans to question EPA officials about why the agency refused to allow California to require reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks.

The answer is not complicated -- California is proposing a stupid idea.

[HKMk23]

A key House Democrat said Monday he plans to question EPA officials about why the agency refused to allow California to require reductions in greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks.

TWO PART ANSWER:
A) The "key House Democrat is a blithering IDIOT.
B) California's law is entirely infeasible; the prop0sed standards simply could NOT be met in the allotted timeframe. Had the law been implemented, come January 1, 2016, nothing larger than a bicycle would be found on any road anywhere in California. yeah, it might have been Utopia for a few days; then the economic reality would set in.

[traditional1]

The face of the Democrat waste-of-time-and-waste-of-money-for-useless-investigations:

Nostrildumbass