[jas3]

What do you think you have been doing on behalf of the AIDS establishment? And yet, when you are asked to debate Duesberg, or any number of hundreds of other MDs and scientists who share his point of view, you put your tail between your legs and scamper away into the shadows. When you finally agree to debate Duesberg et al, I’ll finally have a reason to take you seriously. Until then, you’re just an ankle-biting chihuahua.

I post "on behalf" of myself.

There are not "hudrends" of scientists who believe Duesberg's theories. The sites you posted in the last thread completely misprepresent the views of many if not most of the people they quote. I gave you SPECIFIC examples in the last thread, which you ignored.

Why do you continue to refer to HUNDREDS of scientists, when the actual number who believe that HIV doesn't cause AIDS is less than 100 worldwide? If you disagree, the onus is on you to PROVE that there are more than 100 scientists who believe that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. And neither the Albertan site nor the Rethinking site are current nor reflect the views of the people they quote. You'll actually have to get current quotes that answer the specific question of whether HIV causes AIDS.

Regarding the "ankle-biting chihuahua" comment, I'm not surprised you jumped right into the ad-hominem attacks. Whenever your CONSPIRACY THEORIES are challenged on this or any other of your conspiracy theory threads, the first thing you do is resort to personal attacks.

jas3

[GodGunsGuts]

Sorry jas3, I will not be responding to you anymore other than to point out that you refuse to debate Duesberg. You are free to post whatever you like, but I will not be responding to it. I find you dishonest, and I can’t stand people who go running to the moderators every time they encounter someone they disagree with. Goodbye, and good riddens.