Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tacticalogic

Ok, it looks like all your questions have been answered. The paper was peer reviewed, and it is not too new and not too old, as per your request. So I will ask you again, now that all your requirements have been met, will you carefully read it???


175 posted on 01/16/2008 8:22:24 AM PST by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 162 | View Replies ]


To: GodGunsGuts

According to the peer review, it’s pretty fatally flawed. Can I expect to find the information it contains substantially different that what the peer review represents?


179 posted on 01/16/2008 8:44:08 AM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson