Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Prokopton

I wasn’t referring to Craig’s case, just that the ACLU made a statement that private sex in a public place is okay.

http://www.startribune.com/13817377.html

Read the first paragraph.


19 posted on 01/16/2008 9:25:56 AM PST by Slapshot68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Slapshot68

I don’t know what the ACLU is arguing, based on the first paragraph. I know what the AP says the ACLU is arguing, but since it doesn’t match the facts of the case, I’m not going to assume the AP managed to get this one right. It’s much more likely the ACLU is arguing that a sexual invitation has an expectation of privacy.. which is fine, as long as it also allows a fist as a valid, legal response.

Dealing with the ACLU is like going to a Minnesota airport bathroom.. you may be there for a reason, but it’s disgusting to know who might be standing next to you. Sen. Craig should refute every statement made in his ‘support’ by the ACLU. Then again, so should’ve Rush.

They just love adopting Republicans/conservatives and sending out ‘helpful’ press releases on their behalf.


21 posted on 01/16/2008 9:43:10 AM PST by NCWarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson