I’m sure I wasn’t the only one who read the title and immediately assumed “Democrat”.
Nope. It only took them until the second sentence to mention that he’s a Republican. What you should have assumed is only that if they did not mention his party affiliation, then he is a Dem.
you should know better.....only Pubs are actually brought up on charges....Rats are rarely investigated or reported on when they molest, steal, kill, conspire, etc...
I was surprised he was Republican, but then again both sides have been pretty cruddy lately.
IMHO I would not be surprised if there are more who are currently serving in Congress doing the same thing. That is if enough rocks are turned over and the debris under them is examined.
Read about Romney’s record or Huckabee’s record without knowing party affiliation. Obviously Dermocrat. Huck is a good Democrat because he is pro-life, but he is still a practical Democrat.
I say hang the Scumbag.
Given the RINO slate of candidates (exception Thompson and Hunter), I have ceased to see a meaningful distinction between Republicans and Democrats.
I was pleasantly surprised when I heard this on the radio earlier. I didn’t hear a party so assumed it was Democrat, turns out it was Republican. Strange, not the way things usually work.