How would you know?
In order to determine if something is a lie, you have to have something you know is true to compare it to. You yourself have insisted that science is not about truth so there's no standard of truth to appeal to. Your world view doesn't allow for truth, so it provides no place for accusations of lying.
How can you recognize a lie, when you can't even recognize the truth?
Coyote said: “Try a google for any of this (and stay away from the creationist websites; they lie).”
Metmom- he doesn’t have to back his accusations up- He’s an evo- his word is golden don’t ya know? He finds a few instances where creationist websites might make a mistake, or some lesser creation websites run by unscrupulous unsaved people, who say somethign intentionally incorrect, and all of a sudden every article ever written by a creationist just can’t be true- that’s all the ‘evidence’ he needs to present to make his lame case. When asked to refute creationist science however on reputable creation sites that present scientific facts that are supported by biological evidence, he is mysteriously silent and ignores the challenge and simply waits for another creo thread when he thinks everyone has forgotten his innability to refute scientific facts, and makes the same lame false accusation again in the hopes that someone not familiar with creation science will buy his claptrap. Don’t ya knowe that imature unsubstantiated repetition makes something true?