Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: singfreedom

This also totally ignores oil shale and tar sands. There is a butt load of oil in the world. Its just not currently economically feasible to extract. Currently!


7 posted on 01/18/2008 3:36:42 AM PST by smaug6 (We can't afford to be innocent!! Stand up and face the enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: smaug6

Not to mention coal and natural gas...........


34 posted on 01/18/2008 8:29:18 AM PST by lmailbvmbipfwedu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: smaug6

——This also totally ignores oil shale and tar sands. There is a butt load of oil in the world. Its just not currently economically feasible to extract. Currently!——

Although the first ventures in the Canadian oil sands date back to 1913, the Suncor project went online in 1967 and still operates today. There currently are many producers in this field and area.

Oil Sands History
http://www.syncrude.ca/users/folder.asp?FolderID=5657


37 posted on 01/18/2008 8:44:04 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: smaug6
They're not ignoring unconventional oil:

P.Cera reckons that oil output, including unconventional oil, such as tar sands, could allow oil to peak at much higher levels of as much as 112 million barrels per day, with average rates of more than 100million bpd.

No one, including peak oil theorists (which I'm not), would disagree with this. As conventional oil declines, we will substitute alternatives. The issue is whether unconventional oil, which is somewhat move expensive, will be the price winner vs. other alternatives coming online.

81 posted on 01/19/2008 5:21:32 AM PST by sphinx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson