Posted on 01/19/2008 9:27:53 AM PST by Lorianne
US mortgage lenders targeted minorities and people with low incomes in recent years as the "best candidates" for subprime home loans, with devastating economic consequences, a report claimed Tuesday.
The report by the United for a Fair Economy (UFE) advocacy group said subprime mortgages, home loans issued to Americans with scant finances, were "ruthlessly hawked" and that a "solid majority of subprime loan recipients were people of color."
Hundreds of thousands of families lost their homes to foreclosure last year after failing to keep up with mortgage payments, a hefty chunk of which were subprime loans, amid a national housing downturn that shows no sign of easing.
Some economists believe the almost two-year-long housing slump could pitch the world's largest economy into a recession.
"The crisis has ruined many economic lives and many communities," the UFE report said, adding that "even a surface check of the demographics shows that, in city after city, a solid majority of subprime loan recipients were people of color."
UFE researchers said Detroit, Michigan has been hit by more foreclosure filings than any other city in the one hundred largest US metropolitan areas, and that it ranks third among cities with the largest black populations.
The report's authors said many blacks and poor Americans were deliberately targeted by lenders marketing a range of money-making home loans that were sometimes confusing for borrowers to understand.
"Hungry for new and different products, the financial services industry added features to these loans -- exploding adjustable rates, balloon payments, penalties for early re-payment -- that hobbled their recipients financially and made it unlikely that they would be able, after a brief honeymoon period, to repay the loans at all," the report said.
The Boston-based UFE, which released its findings to coincide with the January 15 birthday of Martin Luther King Jr, the US civil rights icon who was assassinated in 1968, said pre-payment penalties benefit lenders, but penalize borrowers from paying off a loan early.
The group said that although subprime loans were once a niche product, they had swelled during a years-long housing-boom to account for around 20 percent of all US mortgages.
Some lenders made it difficult for borrowers to understand their loan's full terms and steered customers into taking out subprime loans when they could have qualified for better terms, the UFE said.
The report estimated the total loss of wealth "for people of color" including Latinos to be between 163 and 278 billion dollars for subprime loans taken out during the past eight years.
"We believe this represents the greatest loss of wealth for people of color in recent US history," the UFE said, saying America was entering an economic downturn that could match the Great Depression.
The administration of US President George W. Bush is mulling remedies to bolster the economy after brokering a vast mortgage relief plan last month aimed at helping up to 1.2 million distressed homeowners at risk of foreclosure.
"Communities across the nation are being torn apart. As mortgages go into foreclosure, people move out, houses are boarded up, crime and fires increase, neighboring properties are devalued, and the tax base erodes," Brenda Cotto-Escalera, one of the report's co-authors, said.
The UFE also criticized the trading of mortgages between banks, compared to times when loans were overseen by a local bank manager familiar with a borrower's income and outgoings.
The Boston-based group seeks to address what it says is a widening income gap in the United States, and advocates for a "powerful fair economy."
Why are there so many pawn shops in poor neighborhoods? Why are there so many high priced convenience stores in poor neighborhoods? Why are there so many payday loan place in poor neighborhoods? Why are there more abortion clinics in poor neighborhoods? Why are there so many cut-price cigarett places in poor neighborhoods? Why are there so many liquor stores in poor neighborhoods?
Lots of people "do business" with the poor. Why are sub-prime lenders the only ones taking heat?
If they didn’t do business with minorities, they’d be accused of discrimination.
The “revelation” that the sub-prime lenders lent the poor is like saying tobacco companies sell to smokers.
Shocked, I tell you.
As they were indeed.
Of course they targeted the poor. That’s the definition of a subprime loan.
The report by the United for a Fair Economy (UFE)...
That’s as far I I needed to read.
Oh, please.
“Targeted”? As in gave them a loan to buy a house.
When AFP runs an article about policies and actions within the US, it might as well have a barf alert on it.
Congressman Billybob
If they take the stand of "poor minorities being taken advantage of" then you can easily point out that they were given the money just like anyone else.
If they say that "they never should have been given the chance to get in over their heads like that" then you can counter that they weren't discriminated against at all.
One way or another somehow this will be whitey's or greedy jews fault, and you can take that to the bank.
No doubt, it’s not meant for middle-class people with good credit.
Stop there, put article in trash can!
ACORN
Nothing about Congress instigating this?
Well duh! That's why they were called 'sub prime'. Because these idiots were targeting people who had no business borrowing large amounts of money.
And if they didn't do business with the poor and lend them far more money then they could ever hope to pay back, what would they be accused of? Sound business sense?
Discrimination claims were exactly what the lenders were trying to head off. The govt. browbeat the lenders to provide more loans to people with low incomes and bad credit. Now they’re the bad guys for doing just that.
Office of the Press Secretary
June 15, 2002
President Focuses on Home-Ownership in Radio Address
THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. Owning a home lies at the heart of the American dream. A home is a foundation for families and a source of stability for communities. It serves as the foundation of many Americans’ financial security. Yet today, while nearly three-quarters of all white Americans own their homes, less than half of all African Americans and Hispanic Americans are homeowners. We must begin to close this homeownership gap by dismantling the barriers that prevent minorities from owning a piece of the American dream.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.