To: Jim 0216
I’m not convinced that Thompson wants the job.I think he does, but he runs a lousy campaign, IMO. Yes, the MSM ignores him, but if he cannot win or close to winning in SC, it says something about his campaign.
33 posted on
01/19/2008 2:42:07 PM PST by
paudio
(Rose: I loath and despise money! Father: You also spend it!)
To: paudio
I think he does, but he runs a lousy campaign, IMO. Yes, the MSM ignores him, but if he cannot win or close to winning in SC, it says something about his campaign.
I think it has something more to say about the American electorate and sadly what makes up the GOP now days.
I think Fred has run an excellent campaign but average people and the MSM have ignored him because they dont understand him. He talks way above most peoples heads especially when he talks about the Constitution. He is so articulate and knowledgeable but sadly too many peoples eyes glaze over and they tune out when someone talks about Federalism and the role of a limited Constitutional government.
I get it, as do some other of us around here, but the general population and sadly some of our fellow GOP members and Freepers are too easily wooed by the snazzy sound bite and promises of bread and circuses or religious pandering that either cant be kept or plain shouldnt be kept. (Can you say Huckabee?)
So when Maryland hold its primary on Feb 12th - my birthday :(, presuming that Fred drops out by then (and I hope he doesnt because his message need to be said, even if too few are listening), who will I vote for?
I can answer it better by saying who I wont vote for: Huckabee, McCain, Guiliani.
I could vote for Duncan Hunter but hes fallen off the radar screen even more than Fred and I dont expect him to be around by then either.
I guess that leaves Mitt. But Im no more enthusiastic about casting that vote as I was casting a vote for Dole in 96.
I will say that after the primary, I will change my party registration to Independent. I will be able to say that I didnt leave the GOP but the GOP left me.
41 posted on
01/19/2008 3:26:55 PM PST by
Caramelgal
(Rely on the spirit and meaning of the teachings, not on the words or superficial interpretations)
To: paudio
but if he cannot win or close to winning in SC, it says something about his campaign.Betting heavily on Iowa says a LOT about his campaign. At least Huck's folks know how to campaign, and Mitt's understands strategy (and McCain can lead the MSM around by the nose.)
Having the best ideas and being the most articulate, as is Fred, isn't much help when you have a weak team.
45 posted on
01/19/2008 3:41:30 PM PST by
PAR35
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson