Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HelloooClareece
Santorum said that McCain would not work with the Republicans at all, instead he teamed up with the most liberal of the lefties for crap bills like shamnesty.

You forgot to mention that Bush would have signed that bill.

Why is it a “far-right” position to hate that McCain dumped on the first amendment with his campaign finance debacle?

Thompson was one of the original sponsors of McCain-Fgold. Yet he is still beloved by conservatives. And oh yeah, didn't Bush sign that into law?

McCain might not be the most conservative candidate, but he is as conservative as Bush, and more conservative than Romney.

53 posted on 01/20/2008 7:27:34 AM PST by conservit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: conservit

My post had nothing to do with President Bush. It had to do with McCain.

Look around here long enough, at people who actually vote, and see if I’m wrong. I’m not. I don’t know anyone who can stomach voting if McCain is our nominee.

Rudy and Mitt had to compromise in heavily liberal states to get anything done at all. McCain didn’t have to, we had a majority, yet all he did was run to the libs.

His record speaks for itself.


67 posted on 01/20/2008 10:16:52 AM PST by HelloooClareece ("We make war that we may live in peace". Aristotle)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson