Replies

It seems that it’s okay to ignore or marginalize candidates if they don’t fit into our own personal idea of who’s the best candidate. No one gets up in arms as long as it’s not Fred Thompson (for example) being ignored. Voting fraud is okay also as long as it’s not obviously targeted against the favorite.

Where are the millions of emails and telephone calls and faxes that previous elections generated? No need to bother since it’s only Ron Paul and/or Duncan Hunter that are affected.

This nation will have no one to blame but themselves when the media and the powerbrokers choose our next president. And we can pat ourselves on the back when we lose our freedoms and our country because we laughed and jeered at blatant lies and fraud against honest candidates trying to make a difference in our future.

One of the largest counties in Nevada went Ron Paul and he had a respectable showing in all the others. If it’s mentioned at all, it’s a remark that it might have been expected since it is the home of Area 51 and Art Bell. Duncan Hunter pulled in votes here that aren’t even mentioned.

No one seems the least upset that the GOP in Nevada made a real effort to keep voters at home so that their favorites could win. That even after the GOP in Reno endorsed Duncan Hunter.

The majority of people here seem to support Fred Thompson. Where are the supporters handing out literature or holding signs or putting on bumper stickers or yard signs? Everyone moans about his poor showing but you allow it if you aren’t actively doing something to make it better. The only action I see is to insult supporters of other candidates and promote or repeat lies about said candidates.

Yes, I’m a Ron Paul supporter. I’ll write his name in at the General Election. No, I will not vote for the media’s choice for President - at this point, what difference is there between the Democrat and Republican candidates that they are pushing. Obviously, either one will promote their agenda.

End of rant.