Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Romney couldn't connect with S.C. voters
The State , Charleston, S.C. ^

Posted on 01/20/2008 9:34:59 AM PST by barryg

Mitt Romney had it all — money, looks, organization, endorsements and a seasoned staff.

But he still couldn’t crack South Carolina. There was something about the former Massachusetts governor that turned off Palmetto State voters.

He couldn’t connect with them no matter how hard he tried.

“He came across as a luxury car salesman,” said Francis Marion University political scientist Neal Thigpen, a Republican.

Romney spent about $280,000 a week to make his name known across South Carolina.

That was $3 million last year, in South Carolina alone.

He still flopped.

Realizing he couldn’t win here, Romney fled South Carolina last week with no plans to return. He hopped a plane to Nevada to claim his caucus win there Saturday.

The way South Carolinians saw it, Romney was ceding the state to three rivals — U.S. Sen. John McCain of Arizona, former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and former U.S. Sen. Fred Thompson of Tennessee.

Romney made a mistake earlier in the month when he pulled all of his money out of South Carolina to go campaigning in Michigan, said Clemson University professor Dave Woodard.

“His timing was just terrible,” said Woodard, a Republican. “It couldn’t have been worse. What Romney was saying was, ‘I really don’t care about South Carolina.’

“He left us at the altar.”

Romney’s campaign never did catch fire here. After a brief period leading in S.C. polls last fall, he lost steam, slumping to third, fourth or fifth in the polls.

Why? Three reasons.

Romney is from Massachusetts, automatically making him suspect in South Carolina. Voters here don’t trust politicians from the home of Teddy Kennedy, Mike Dukakis and John Kerry.

Voters also questioned Romney’s conservative credentials. His flip-flopping on key social issues — abortion and gay rights —caused S.C. voters to wonder about his claims of being a conservative.

Among S.C. voters who told exit pollsters Saturday the main reason they voted for a candidate was because he “says what he believes,” Romney finished last among the five candidates who actively campaigned here.

Romney’s Mormon faith also hurt him among evangelical voters in the Republican primary. Many Southern Baptists, who comprise the largest denomination in the state, see Mormonism as a cult. Romney ran fourth among S.C. voters who identified themselves in exit polls as born-again or evangelical Christians.

However, Thigpen rejects the notion that Romney lost South Carolina because of his faith.

“It wasn’t his faith,” he said. “It was his phonyism.”

Romney’s decision to pack up to Nevada and its caucus were an attempt to build on his lone primary victory, in Michigan. Romney also won Wyoming’s little-watched caucus.

His departure from South Carolina served to lower expectations for him here, even though he started to advertise again in the primary’s days and made a get-out-the-vote effort.

The other high-profile Republican candidates decided to ignore Nevada in favor of South Carolina with its history of creating and demolishing Republican hopefuls.

For Romney, Nevada presented a particular opportunity. His faith was an asset in that state with its large Mormon population.

One in four Nevada caucus-goers was Mormon; 95 percent supported Romney, according to entrance polls there.

Romney aides have attributed their candidate’s Iowa caucus loss to suspicion about his faith among evangelicals, who rallied behind Huckabee, a Baptist preacher.

Thigpen said Romney made a wise decision to travel to Nevada.

“Why kick a dead horse?” he asked, referring to South Carolina. “Why waste your money on something that doesn’t look promising?”

But in essentially declaring that South Carolina didn’t count, Romney missed a chance to prove he can be a winning candidate nationwide.

South Carolina is “a test-tube state,” said Chip Felker, a Greenville-based Republican consultant. “If you win here, you have shown you can win elsewhere.”


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: South Carolina
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-215 next last
To: WOSG

And from 2002

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P_w9pquznG4


81 posted on 01/20/2008 10:48:59 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

“They” are going to have stuff on anyone the GOP runs.

If they don’t, they’ll make stuff up!

It’s a fight.

Romney WINS. He’s proving that, over and over.


82 posted on 01/20/2008 10:49:49 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (So-called free trade advocates = "China Firsters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: WOSG
You said he passed AWB in Massachusetts. that is false, it was already in place.

You've already been refuted by the same liar that you're shilling and spamming for.

"I signed an assault weapon ban in Massachusetts governor because it provided for a relaxation of licensing requirements for gun owners in Massachusetts, which was a big plus." --"Mitt" Romney

Oh, and he supported the federal Brady Bill.

"The Brady Bill has changed over time, and, of course, technology has changed over time. I would have supported the original assault weapon ban." --"Mitt" Romney

83 posted on 01/20/2008 10:49:59 AM PST by Mojave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Good luck to your guy. Apparently, I no longer have a dog in this hunt.


84 posted on 01/20/2008 10:51:46 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: eleni121

When was the last time a high-powered businessman became president? Look at the election of 1992, held when a mild recession was already going away. Clinton won easily campaigning on the economy and promoting his economic mush.


85 posted on 01/20/2008 10:52:26 AM PST by LiveFree99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

That’s the spirit.


86 posted on 01/20/2008 10:52:27 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (So-called free trade advocates = "China Firsters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: barryg

Welcome to Free Republic.


87 posted on 01/20/2008 10:52:58 AM PST by Blue State Insurgent (Thompson Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

How about Rick Santorum as McCain’s VP?

A good man & I think he’d pull in Pennsylvania for the win.


88 posted on 01/20/2008 10:53:57 AM PST by Republic If You Can Keep It
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: barryg

You signed up today, to express concerns about “something” you don’t like about Romney?

James Carville? Is that you?...


89 posted on 01/20/2008 10:54:20 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (So-called free trade advocates = "China Firsters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: LiveFree99

Here’s one for you. Aside from Bush 41 (considered mainly from Texas), can you name the last NE Republican to be President?


90 posted on 01/20/2008 10:54:51 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

JFK.


91 posted on 01/20/2008 10:56:04 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (So-called free trade advocates = "China Firsters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Republic If You Can Keep It

If Santorum couldn’t manage to get himself re-elected to his Senate seat, how would he help carry Pennsylvania in the Presidential election? (I agree he’s a good man, and was very disappointed when he was defeated, but I’m just trying to be realistic.)


92 posted on 01/20/2008 10:57:59 AM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: LiveFree99

The thing is, Mitt can bring Michigan into our column.

That would offset losing a big state like Ohio with room to spare, given the other Bush 2004 states.


93 posted on 01/20/2008 10:58:36 AM PST by Dragonspirit (We fight it out as good friends now, but in 2008 we UNITE against our enemy!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rational Thought

Romney was outright slaughtered in S.C. losing 2:1 to McCain. What a complete loser, not even being able to break half the number of votes list that RINO McCain, the Romeny campaign is on life support and it may be time to pull the plug.


94 posted on 01/20/2008 10:59:19 AM PST by trumandogz (Hunter Thompson 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Republic If You Can Keep It

Santorum is another example of how the Conservative movement is dead, for now. McCain wouldn’t take him (My money would be on Lieberman) and Santorum lost his re-election bid in PA to a Liberal Democrat by 18%.


95 posted on 01/20/2008 10:59:28 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

I believe Reagan supported the Brady bill. Does that mean he wasn’t conservative? Would you have voted for him given that?


96 posted on 01/20/2008 10:59:52 AM PST by Reno232
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Graybeard58

Mitt has “carpetbagger” written all over him. Rudy’s brand is “damnyankee”.


97 posted on 01/20/2008 11:00:35 AM PST by SWAMPSNIPER (THE SECOND AMENDMENT, A MATTER OF FACT, NOT A MATTER OF OPINION)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

LOL!...and how true!


98 posted on 01/20/2008 11:00:50 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: trumandogz

The only reason Romney lost SC, is he refused to take a pro-Confederate flag position.

That’s hardly a national issue.

-

Romney’s winning big, and people like him.

Rush Limbaugh likes him.

Ann Coulter likes him.

His family likes him.

He’s a good candidate! And he wins.


99 posted on 01/20/2008 11:01:24 AM PST by Cringing Negativism Network (So-called free trade advocates = "China Firsters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Republic If You Can Keep It

Santorum has gone on many radio shows in the past few weeks opposing McPain ....with good reason ...


100 posted on 01/20/2008 11:03:12 AM PST by Neu Pragmatist (No RINO's -VOTE FRED ... Thank you :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 201-215 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson