[The Ghost of FReepers Past]

You can’t deny that Thompson was hounding him. Think what you want about how it should have turned out, but that doesn’t make Huckabee wrong here. I imagine Thompson is happy about that and if nothing else, he is probably very glad he helped McCain beat Huckabee. Thompson endorsed McCain in 2000 you know. I doubt he sees this as a principled loss. After all, it’s not about him.

[SaxxonWoods]

You can’t deny that Thompson was hounding him.

Heh, heh.

You wrote “hounding” about Huckleberry, er, Huckabee.

Go Fred!

[reasonisfaith]

I worked the Thompson campaign in SC. On Saturday Huckabee’s tactic was to push deceptive calls to voters. He sent the message that Fred “couldn’t win,” so therefore vote Huckabee.

Volunteers for Thompson were given scripts to counter these deceptive tactics. The campaign staff didn’t tell us which candidate was putting out the deception, and the scripts only mentioned “opponents.” How’s that for honest, principled campaigning by Thompson?

How can anyone think Hucklebee is anything but a dishonest fraud?

[SoConPubbie]

You can’t deny that Thompson was hounding him. Think what you want about how it should have turned out, but that doesn’t make Huckabee wrong here. I imagine Thompson is happy about that and if nothing else, he is probably very glad he helped McCain beat Huckabee. Thompson endorsed McCain in 2000 you know. I doubt he sees this as a principled loss. After all, it’s not about him.

More unsubstantiated garbage from the Huckster camp and his supporters.

No matter how many times you repeat this tripe, it will still not make it true.

The reason your candidate lost SC is that his dismal record as Governor is finally catching up to his campaign rhetoric.

The same thing happened to Rudy, and it has only begun for the Huckster!

[Terriergal]

You can’t deny that Thompson was hounding him.

Uh... define "hounding"?

reasonisfaith and sageb1 have you any idea what this 'hounding' could mean?

[Terriergal]

You may want to check post #39.