Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/21/2008 6:49:32 PM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Lorianne
turned over temporarily

Why is this such a problem if it's temporary?
2 posted on 01/21/2008 6:52:27 PM PST by visualops (artlife.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

My family had to give up private land for Lake Rayburn in Texas. Happens more and more as our population increases. I don’t mind public land being used to build a fence. Maybe then some of us can hold onto our private land


3 posted on 01/21/2008 6:53:28 PM PST by BeckB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

As harsh as it may sound, this sounds like a perfect use of eminent domain.

National security? Sure.


4 posted on 01/21/2008 6:55:27 PM PST by Eagle Eye (Agreeing with Democrats = agreeing with Al Queada)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

Build the Fence!


5 posted on 01/21/2008 6:57:11 PM PST by mdittmar (May God watch over those who serve,and have served,to keep us free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

BUILD DUNCAN HUNTER’S FENCE and ENFORCE THE LAW!


9 posted on 01/21/2008 7:01:43 PM PST by RasterMaster (Rudy McRomneyson = KENNEDY wing of the Republican Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
The government had warned the city, which opposes the fence, that it would sue under eminent domain laws to secure access to the land. The judge's order, issued in the Texas Western District Court, Del Rio division, said the United States was entitled to possession or control of the property for 180 days.

This is the constitutionally legitimate use of eminent domain. I suspect the city opposes the fence because it is an enclave of Mexican nationals. Life is about to become inconvenient for the illegals in town.

12 posted on 01/21/2008 7:05:49 PM PST by Myrddin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

“The Homeland Security Department is trying to build 370 miles of border fence by the end of the year.”

Yeah, right. I will believe it when I see it. I also want the double fence that was originally planned; not some stupid little white picket fence with a sign that reads “Don’t Trespass”.


13 posted on 01/21/2008 7:14:19 PM PST by freekitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne; Liberty Valance

I vote with the folks who say we build the fence so that Eagle Pass is left on the Mexican side.

See how they like being real Mexicans.


15 posted on 01/21/2008 7:36:44 PM PST by Brucifer (G. W. Bush "The dog ate my copy of the Constitution.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne

my Grandfather gave up 40,000 acres for a lake to help the Erie canal have enough water. These chumps can suck it up and let the fence be built.


20 posted on 01/22/2008 4:29:53 AM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Lorianne
The Homeland Security Department is trying to build 370 miles of border fence by the end of the year. A law signed by President Bush in October and supported by both of Texas' U.S. senators mandated a total of 700 miles of fence along the border.

Bump

25 posted on 01/22/2008 6:06:50 AM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson