Posted on 01/22/2008 8:31:21 AM PST by Papabear47
18 posted on 01/21/2008 12:05:01 PM CST by Old Teufel Hunden
You seem to be advocating violence against people who support Hillary, intimidation at the very least, neither is acceptable in a free society.
Further you even contradict yourself with your opinions about felons owning guns:
The constitution (in the 5th and 14th amendments) allow for the provision of denying convicted felons civil liberties.
12 posted on 01/16/2008 3:06:25 PM CST by Old Teufel Hunden
I agree, non violent crimes should have their 2A rights restored.
20 posted on 01/17/2008 6:17:51 AM CST by Old Teufel Hunden
“You seem to be advocating violence against people who support Hillary, intimidation at the very least, neither is acceptable in a free society.”
There you go again, lying about what I said. You can’t even comprehend the explanation in my previous post. Then you go onto throw more lines out that I have posted in the past. You sure you’re not a Dumbocrat? You’re good at distorting the truth after all...
All of this is to distort what the subject really was. You obviously don’t want to talk about it. I originally posted about the sheeple of Illinois which you took offense to.
I explained what sheeple were. People who sit there and take it. Just not voting for the people who do it to you is not good enough. You have three choices:
1. Become sheeple
2. Get involved and try to stop the gun grabbers
3. Move
By your attempt at obfuscation you are showing me and everyone else on this board that you are in category 1. You have decided to sit and take it.
If you displayed the same dilligence in trying to stop your state’s gun grabbers as you do researching my past posts you might be able to move into group 2 some day.
Your link yields the Illinois House website for a social security bill. Where is the page for the ammo-related matter mentioned at the beginning of the thread?
FYI, the correct bill is H4258, not 59.
When you go to the Illinois General Assembly website you find Both HB4258 and 59 as Ammunition accountability Act.Why I do not know,just the way our crooks do things.
It must be a typo on the official website. Anyway, thanks for the heads up.
The last reply of yours I bothered to read was #17. Go on huffing and puffing though, maybe some one else will read it.
“The last reply of yours I bothered to read was #17. “
It shows, you must be brain dead sheeple...
(*) I coined the term myself, but then googled it to find I'm not the first.
I take it this is being pushed by some of Obama’s buddies in the Illinois State House????
It would ban all forms of reloading, including the materials used to make or prepare such reloading. So I would guess bullet molds could be contraband.
By strict interpretation of the law, then so would be wheel weights, and shotgun pellets.
And do you think liberals really care what side-affects their legislation might cause? Of course not. They don’t care.
I have a friend who works at the Remington Arms Ammunition plant near here. He said that when California tried to force a similar law, the company had already discussed the concept and decided that complying with the law was essentially impossible. They produce literally MILLIONS of rounds of ammo EVERY DAY - and that is just the Arkansas plant.
The law is completely impractical (which I believe the liberals know). Thus it is a tacit ban on ammunition.
Should these laws ever actually start to go into effect, we’ll know the awkward phase is essentially over.
I think we should take the passage of such laws (and application/enforcement) as a definite sign...
Even if this passed, do you think we “sheeple” of Illinois would obey it?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.