MassResistance mixes lies and misleading statements to weave a false story for their own purposes. This has all been debunked several times, and I’m sure someone will be along to clean up this thread as well.
For example, Romney did not ban boy scouts from the olympics.
And Romney’s position on Gays in 1994 did not put him to the left of Kennedy — in fact, he argued he’d be more effective for true gay rights because he was not as radical on the issue as Ted Kennedy was. In 1994, the LCR were not pushing for Gay marriage, and Romney never supported Gay Marriage.
Romney had no choice on gay marriage in Mass. The court ruled that the existing marriage law HAD to cover same-sex marriages, and the legislature failed to fix it in the 180-day period provided, because the legislature backed gay marriage, so much so that we could only get 45 votes for a referendum.
Sorry, most everything else they wrote has similar flaws, but it’s already 1am.
Could you please explain to me what “true gay rights” are? I was under the impression that they had the same rights everyone else does. Now if you mean special rights, that’s lib talk.
You are right, he did not ban the Boy Scouts, but he also did not continue the tradition of having their organization as volunteers during the Olympics. He made up some odd excuse but whatever the reason, I’m sure it made the sodomites he promised to help very happy.
And I don't think the spam scam trick will get the mods to pull this thread.
Thank you for your work on these sites. These anti-Mitt types are so dishonest it amazes me.
Just like the devil, mixing half truths and lies to convert people to the dark side. Some of these DU transplants and Mormon haters lap this stuff up.
Anyone can see by reading the timeline that Romney’s the one weaving a false story. This level of detail hasn’t been posted previously. Romney had no right to unilaterally direct the town clerks to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples.
If he couldn’t stand up to two-bit hacks in MA, how can he stand up to Pelosi, Reid, Kennedy et al?