Clinton promises end to economic excess
Hillary Clinton said that if she became president, the federal government would take a more active role in the economy, in an effort to address what she said were the excesses of the market and the Bush administration.
She told the New York Times she would put her emphasis on issues like inequality and the role of institutions like government, rather than market forces, in addressing them.
She said that economic excesses — including executive-pay packages she characterized as often “offensive” and “wrong” and a tax code that had become “so far out of whack” in favoring the wealthy — were holding down middle-class living standards.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1956969/posts
What’s the difference between that and Rudy’s promise, via new campaign ads, to expand FEMA?
Maybe it’s Rudy’s sanctuary city policy that makes you feel comfortable.
Principled conservatives don’t vote for anyone whose only claim to credit is their ability to prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, they are not Hillary Clinton.