[Feldkurat_Katz]

Some parts of the press release have nothing to do with the law:

-- Hispanics in Port Chester voted cohesively for their candidates of choice and that these candidates of choice were routinely defeated;

The point being? Is there a law which says "candidates of choice" cannot be defeated?

-- Voting in Port Chester is polarized by ethnicity;

The point being? Is it illegal to vote along ethnic lines? Aren't Hispanics voting for "candidates of choice"?

-- Racial appeals -- in particular an anti-Hispanic flyer in the 2007 mayoral race -- had marred recent political campaigns.

Minority candidates make racial appeals frequently, there is nothing illegal about it. Have the authors of this press release read the First Amendment?

[Stingray51]

Hispanics in Port Chester voted cohesively for their candidates of choice

How does the court know this? I thought we had a secret ballot in this country. Oh, so the court must be relying on polls....