Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

5 Myths About Breaking Our Foreign Oil Habit
The Washington Post ^ | January 13, 2008 | Robert Bryce

Posted on 01/24/2008 7:15:13 AM PST by xjcsa

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: mountainlyons
There is more oil in the oil shale in Colorado and Utah than in Saudi Arabia. Anwar and the gulf could provide enough oil to make us independent form Mexico and Venezuela. If we did not import such massive amounts the world price would fall and we would have a steady price that would would not fluctuate much. What would be gas price for $30-40 per barrel oil?

Until the cost of extracting shale oil, approaches the costs of pumping light, sweet crude from Saudi Arabia and elsewhere, the capital market will continue to invest in more oil fields and purchase oil from abroad. If you increase the cost of energy, everything else goes up. And then there are the environmentalists and Congress who are skewing the marketplace by preventing exploration and drilling and refining. We aren't going to conserve our way out of this mess.

41 posted on 01/24/2008 8:05:46 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

No Food For Fuel !! ..bump


42 posted on 01/24/2008 8:06:38 AM PST by TexasCajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Saudi Arabia represents about 10% of our imported oil. Canada provides almost twice a much.

I'm not sure where you get that math. Saudi Arabia provides 15% of our imported oil, Canada provides 19% or about 28% more than Saudia Arabia. Most of our imported oil comes from OPEC.

10,092 MBPD All Countries
5,417 MBPD OPEC
4,675 MBPD Non OPEC
2,147 MBPD Persian Gulf
1,882 MBPD Canada
1,465 MBPD Saudi Arabia
1,386 MBPD Mexico
1,173 MBPD Venezuela
1,028 MBPD Nigeria

43 posted on 01/24/2008 8:07:02 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SAJ

I spent five years in the Kingdom and visited the wheat fields, which were using unreplenishable water from deep wells. At one time they were the fifth or sixth largest exporter of wheat. The reason was quite simple: corruption. Many members of the Royal Family made a lot of money from wheat production, even though it made no sense in terms of the production costs per bushel.


44 posted on 01/24/2008 8:09:37 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: thackney
You are confusing yourself with that table.

Go to the yearly table --- http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/pet_move_impcus_a2_nus_epc0_im0_mbbl_a.htm --- and read the definition. You list the Persian Gulf and Saudi Arabia as separate, yet the Saudi exports to the US are included in the Persian Gulf numbers. Same thing with the OPEC numbers.

2006 was the last full year reported by EIA and here are the top 5 countries of origin in thousands of barrels.

Canada -- 637,854
Mexico -- 575,501
Saudi Arabia -- 519,236
Venezuala -- 417,000
Nigeria -- 378,760

From all countries, we imported 3,693,081 thousand barrels vs 3,404,894 in the year 2001 an increase of almost 300,000. But imports from the Persian Gulf region, have decreased over that same time frame from 972,479 in 2001 to 788,432 in 2006.

45 posted on 01/24/2008 8:15:39 AM PST by Ditto (Global Warming: The 21st Century's Snake Oil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Ditto

No, I am using data is not more than a year old as you are.

Go to the last 12 reported months. Saudi Arabia has sent us more crude than Mexico.


46 posted on 01/24/2008 8:18:19 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
You list the Persian Gulf and Saudi Arabia as separate

I did not intend them to be read as separate. As you said, they are included in the larger number. I was not trying to define the Persian Gulf as being separate from Saudi Arabia. Just as the EIA does, I included it for reference in the country data.

47 posted on 01/24/2008 8:22:26 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: thackney
The same place you do. These figures vary from month to month and I am including crude oil and products. The point is that Saudi Arabia is among the top five oil suppliers to the US, but 10 to 13% is not a big deal. The Saudis send far more of their oil elsewhere.

In October the US imported 401,452 million bbls of crude oil and products a month worldwide with 43,394 coming from Saudi Arabia. That works out to 10.8%.

Total Crude Oil and Products

Most of our imported oil comes from OPEC.

True, but it is about 50-50. Of course OPEC includes Nigeria and Venezuela. In terms of crude oil and products, then we get most of our supplies from non-OPEC countries.

48 posted on 01/24/2008 8:25:08 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: kabar
I am including crude oil and products

Why did you add in products? The author said crude oil, not total petroleum products. I was pointing out the author's incorrect statement. Have you looked at the products we get from Mexico? Most of them are residual oil, unfinished oils and other low value products not capable of being used for gasoline or diesel production.

The Saudis send far more of their oil elsewhere.

And if we were more energy independent, even less of it would come to the US.

2006
Mexico -- 575,501
Saudi Arabia -- 519,236

And since the Mexico has continued to decline and Saudi Arabia has grown. Over the last reported 12 months the values for crude oil now stand at:

Nov 2006 - Oct 2007
Saudi Arabia -- 521,814
Mexico -- 514,074

U.S. Crude Oil Imports from Mexico
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/mcrimusmx1m.htm

U.S. Crude Oil Imports from Saudi Arabia
http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/dnav/pet/hist/mcrimussa1m.htm

The trend is getting worse for funding those that consider us enemies and sending our dollars to foreign nations. It is not a trend that is in our interests.

49 posted on 01/24/2008 8:37:17 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: kabar
Until the cost of extracting shale oil, approaches the costs of pumping light, sweet crude from Saudi Arabia and elsewhere, the capital market will continue to invest in more oil fields and purchase oil from abroad. If you increase the cost of energy, everything else goes up. And then there are the environmentalists and Congress who are skewing the marketplace by preventing exploration and drilling and refining. We aren’t going to conserve our way out of this mess.

Rockymountian News said it would be $30 a barrel for Exon. Shell said $40. It is doable

50 posted on 01/24/2008 8:41:09 AM PST by mountainlyons (Hard core conservative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: thackney
The trend is getting worse for funding those that consider us enemies and sending our dollars to foreign nations. It is not a trend that is in our interests.

I couldn't agree more. However, the world's demand for oil will continue to increase. There will be no shortage of customers. And most of the world's exportable oil is in the Middle East. That's the point. And the Saudis, with the largest reserves and the ability to pump up to 10 million bbls a day, have excess capacity above their OPEC cap. They are not our enemy and we are competing against the Chinese and Japanese for long term oil contracts.

The US population growth also affects demand. We will add 167 million people in the next 50 years. They will need energy as well.

51 posted on 01/24/2008 8:57:06 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: mountainlyons
Rockymountian News said it would be $30 a barrel for Exon. Shell said $40. It is doable

If it is doable, what is stopping it? What kind of capital investment is required and how long will it take?

52 posted on 01/24/2008 8:59:02 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: thackney
Our crude oil imports from Saudi Arabia have been declining over the past three years.
53 posted on 01/24/2008 9:04:08 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: kabar

And the trend has since reversed itself.


54 posted on 01/24/2008 9:09:37 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: Ditto
The biggest and most immediate part of the trick would be to get rid of 60# of the commuting; that could be done very quickly, in a couple of months or so, with neighborhood work sites. In any given metro area there simply cannot be more than about 20% of the workforce which needs to be in a given place five days a week; everybody else could working four of those days from neighborhood sites which they walked to or drove half a mile to, and that would empty our highways.

In fact God could come down out of the sky right now and give us all the gasoline we'd need for the rest of our lives and it wouldn't solve the problem; you'd still have people spending three to five hours in traffic every day in metro areas getting to and from work. At some point the psychiatric bills are going to be more than any nation could afford.

55 posted on 01/24/2008 9:41:24 AM PST by jeddavis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: thackney

One year does not a trend make. And there is nothing wrong with getting oil from Saudi Arabia.


56 posted on 01/24/2008 10:08:56 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber
Some of us have being making these same points here on FR for some time now.

I have been making these same arguments here on FR for years. There is a strong undercurrent of technological utopianism here (the idea that some "silver bullet" will be discovered that will eliminate scarcity and change human nature) that is as un-conservative as any other kind of utopianism.

57 posted on 01/24/2008 10:11:56 AM PST by rogue yam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xjcsa

Whether we get our oil from Canada or from Saudi Arabia, the fact remains that the price of crude can be greatly influenced by fluctuations in OPEC supply. OPEC can influence US elections by squeezing supply and thus the price of gasoline and thus the world and US economy.

The net result is that American politicians tend to suck up to OPEC nations and Islamic causes at the expense of free countries like Israel.


58 posted on 01/24/2008 10:19:45 AM PST by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar
And there is nothing wrong with getting oil from Saudi Arabia.

In this we disagree.

I do not comprehend ignoring many of our resources while funding those that fund Islamic hatred of us.

59 posted on 01/24/2008 11:02:58 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: kabar
One year does not a trend make.

How do you feel about 3 years of declining Mexico oil production?

World Oil Supply, 2003-2007
http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/ipsr/t22.xls

60 posted on 01/24/2008 11:06:35 AM PST by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson